Autonomous mechanistic discovery of colorectal cancer vulnerabilities via multi-scale AI swarms
On the map: LLM reasoning → Clinical and biomedical applications
Abstract (arXiv)
The acceleration of automated scientific discovery has been fundamentally bottlenecked by the epistemic gap between the semantic reasoning of large language models (LLMs) and the deterministic physics of mammalian biology. While recent multi-agent frameworks have achieved autonomous hypothesis generation and in vitro experimental analysis, they lack the mathematically grounded, causal constraints required for multi-scale clinical translation. Furthermore, while algorithmic clinical digital twins successfully forecast biological states, they rely on black-box latent spaces, sacrificing mechanistic interpretability for predictive accuracy. Here, we introduce the Multi-Scale Autonomous Discovery Engine (Octopus), a neuro-symbolic architecture that unites zero-leakage, local LLM swarms with strict algorithmic physics engines. Rather than stopping at isolated cellular assays, the system autonomously generated therapeutic hypotheses against in vitro CRISPR dependency data (CCLE), traced dynamic causal cascades using mechanistic interpretability (XGBoost SHAP vectors), and orthogonally translated the emergent vulnerabilities in silico to predict in vivo mammalian tumor trajectory (PDX) and human overall survival (Marisa). In a fully unsupervised sweep of colorectal cancer transcriptomes, the pipeline autonomously identified Insulin-like Growth Factor 2 (IGF2) as a strictly bounded vulnerability to 5-Fluorouracil resistance. The discovery maintained significance after rigorous Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction (q=0.0292, Log-Rank p=0.0007 ) and successfully predicted significant in vivo tumor volume shrinkage in an independent mouse cohort (Mann-Whitney p=0.0373). By bridging the chasm between multi-agent reasoning and mathematically bounded clinical survival, this framework establishes a verifiable, zero-leakage paradigm for automated, end-to-end biomedical discovery.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Clinical and biomedical applications, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 8 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
8 of 45 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
- 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 738
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 353
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Researchcited by 150
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Contextual Invertible World Models: A Neuro-Symbolic Agentic Framework for Colorectal Cancer Drug Response
- 2026Towards Autonomous Mechanistic Reasoning in Virtual Cells
- 2026Towards World Models in Biomedical Research
- 2025When AI Does Science: Evaluating the Autonomous AI Scientist KOSMOS in Radiation Biology
- 2025STELLA: Self-Evolving LLM Agent for Biomedical Research
- 2026SAGE: Agentic Framework for Interpretable and Clinically Translatable Computational Pathology Biomarker Discovery
- 2025AI Agents in Drug Discovery
- 2025OwkinZero: Accelerating Biological Discovery with AI