mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Von Mises-Fisher Mixture Model with Dynamic Shrinkage for Realistic Test-Time Transduction

arXiv 2607.15851 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2026cs.CV cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

A range of methods aim to enhance the performance of vision-language models (VLMs) at test time. Among them, transduction has emerged as a promising paradigm due to its strong compatibility and efficiency. However, realistic evaluations often involve highly imbalanced class distributions, which cause performance degradation or even collapse. In this work, we systematically revisit transduction from the perspective of penalized likelihood estimation (PLE), showing that PLE with a KL-divergence anchor term naturally yields an adaptive shrinkage behavior between prior anchors and empirical estimates. From this viewpoint, the brittleness of transductive methods can be attributed to the absence of anchoring mechanism and static modeling of the shrinkage strength. Therefore, we propose Mixture of Von Mises-Fisher Models with Dynamic Shrinkage (MOON). MOON is built upon a mixture of von Mises-Fisher distributions to model feature representations on the unit hypersphere. To handle imbalance, MOON dynamically adjusts the shrinkage strength using zero-shot priors at both instance and class levels. Thus, it suppresses unreliable assignments and prevents harmful updates from outlier classes, thereby mitigating negative transfer. MOON is model-agnostic, training-free, and requires no task-specific hyperparameter tuning. Extensive experiments further validate the advantage of MOON in both performance and efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/walawalagoose/MOON

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 14 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2026.

Builds on

14 of 60 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026What Drives Test-Time Adaptation for CLIP? A Controlled Empirical Study from an Update Perspective12 Jun
  2. 2024BoostAdapter: Improving Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation via Regional Bootstrapping20 Oct
  3. 2024DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models28 Sep

Other references · 11

  1. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  2. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
  3. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 716
  4. 2020Tent: Fully Test-time Adaptation by Entropy Minimizationcited by 69
  5. 2023On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptationcited by 64
  6. 2024A Hard-to-Beat Baseline for Training-free CLIP-based Adaptationcited by 53
  7. 2017von Mises-Fisher Mixture Model-based Deep learning: Application to Face Verificationcited by 46
  8. 2024DINO as a von Mises-Fisher mixture modelcited by 15
  9. 2025Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation via Probabilistic Gaussian Alignmentcited by 6
  10. 2026Do All Individual Layers Help? An Empirical Study of Task-Interfering Layers in Vision-Language Modelscited by 2
  11. 2026Adaptive Disentangled Representation Learning for Incomplete Multi-View Multi-Label Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026ProtoDCS: Towards Robust and Efficient Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  3. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models
  4. 2026Ramen: Robust Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models with Active Sample Selection
  5. 2026Efficient Test-time Adaptation through Candidate Verification and Divergence Shifts
  6. 2025Class-Aware Prototype Learning with Negative Contrast for Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Training-Free Test-Time Adaptation with Brownian Distance Covariance in Vision-Language Models
  8. 2025The Illusion of Progress? A Critical Look at Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models