mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation via Probabilistic Gaussian Alignment

arXiv 2508.15568 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2025cs.CV cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time adaptation (TTA) enhances the zero-shot robustness under distribution shifts by leveraging unlabeled test data during inference. Despite notable advances, several challenges still limit its broader applicability. First, most methods rely on backpropagation or iterative optimization, which limits scalability and hinders real-time deployment. Second, they lack explicit modeling of class-conditional feature distributions. This modeling is crucial for producing reliable decision boundaries and calibrated predictions, but it remains underexplored due to the lack of both source data and supervision at test time. In this paper, we propose ADAPT, an Advanced Distribution-Aware and backPropagation-free Test-time adaptation method. We reframe TTA as a Gaussian probabilistic inference task by modeling class-conditional likelihoods using gradually updated class means and a shared covariance matrix. This enables closed-form, training-free inference. To correct potential likelihood bias, we introduce lightweight regularization guided by CLIP priors and a historical knowledge bank. ADAPT requires no source data, no gradient updates, and no full access to target data, supporting both online and transductive settings. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance under a wide range of distribution shifts with superior scalability and robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2025.

Builds on

46 of 73 references.

References · 46

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  3. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  4. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  5. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  6. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  7. 2021Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillationcited by 1,619
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  9. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  10. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  11. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
  12. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
34 more
  1. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 382
  2. 2022Tip-Adapter: Training-free Adaption of CLIP for Few-shot Classificationcited by 362
  3. 2018Learning to Propagate Labels: Transductive Propagation Network for Few-shot Learningcited by 211
  4. 2023Diverse Data Augmentation with Diffusions for Effective Test-time Prompt Tuningcited by 154
  5. 2024Efficient Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 141
  6. 2022Task Residual for Tuning Vision-Language Modelscited by 123
  7. 2022SuS-X: Training-Free Name-Only Transfer of Vision-Language Modelscited by 119
  8. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalizationcited by 101
  9. 2020Laplacian Regularized Few-Shot Learningcited by 92
  10. 2023Not All Features Matter: Enhancing Few-shot CLIP with Adaptive Prior Refinementcited by 84
  11. 2024C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersioncited by 83
  12. 2024On the test-time zero-shot generalization of vision-language models: Do we really need prompt learning?cited by 67
  13. 2024A Hard-to-Beat Baseline for Training-free CLIP-based Adaptationcited by 53
  14. 2024Dual Memory Networks: A Versatile Adaptation Approach for Vision-Language Modelscited by 52
  15. 2024Dual Prototype Evolving for Test-Time Generalization of Vision-Language Modelscited by 38
  16. 2024Boosting Vision-Language Models with Transductioncited by 36
  17. 2024DPCore: Dynamic Prompt Coreset for Continual Test-Time Adaptationcited by 33
  18. 2024Just Shift It: Test-Time Prototype Shifting for Zero-Shot Generalization with Vision-Language Modelscited by 32
  19. 2025DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuningcited by 31
  20. 2024Label Propagation for Zero-shot Classification with Vision-Language Modelscited by 28
  21. 2024AWT: Transferring Vision-Language Models via Augmentation, Weighting, and Transportationcited by 28
  22. 2024Enhancing Zero-Shot Vision Models by Label-Free Prompt Distribution Learning and Bias Correctingcited by 26
  23. 2024DOTA: Distributional Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 23
  24. 2024Historical Test-time Prompt Tuning for Vision Foundation Modelscited by 22
  25. 2025Bayesian Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Modelscited by 22
  26. 2024BoostAdapter: Improving Vision-Language Test-Time Adaptation via Regional Bootstrappingcited by 19
  27. 2025Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 14
  28. 2024Efficient Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
  29. 2024Boosting Vision-Language Models for Histopathology Classification: Predict all at oncecited by 8
  30. 2024Efficient and Context-Aware Label Propagation for Zero-/Few-Shot Training-Free Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelcited by 8
  31. 2025Online Gaussian Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
  32. 2024Text and Image Are Mutually Beneficial: Enhancing Training-Free Few-Shot Classification with CLIPcited by 6
  33. 2021A Normality Test for Multivariate Dependent Samplescited by 1
  34. 2021Joint Normality Test Via Two-Dimensional Projectioncited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.