mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RADEP: A Resilient Adaptive Defense Framework Against Model Extraction Attacks

arXiv 2505.19364 ↗First posted 25 May 2025cs.CRcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) enables users to leverage powerful machine learning models through cloud-based APIs, offering scalability and ease of deployment. However, these services are vulnerable to model extraction attacks, where adversaries repeatedly query the application programming interface (API) to reconstruct a functionally similar model, compromising intellectual property and security. Despite various defense strategies being proposed, many suffer from high computational costs, limited adaptability to evolving attack techniques, and a reduction in performance for legitimate users. In this paper, we introduce a Resilient Adaptive Defense Framework for Model Extraction Attack Protection (RADEP), a multifaceted defense framework designed to counteract model extraction attacks through a multi-layered security approach. RADEP employs progressive adversarial training to enhance model resilience against extraction attempts. Malicious query detection is achieved through a combination of uncertainty quantification and behavioral pattern analysis, effectively identifying adversarial queries. Furthermore, we develop an adaptive response mechanism that dynamically modifies query outputs based on their suspicion scores, reducing the utility of stolen models. Finally, ownership verification is enforced through embedded watermarking and backdoor triggers, enabling reliable identification of unauthorized model use. Experimental evaluations demonstrate that RADEP significantly reduces extraction success rates while maintaining high detection accuracy with minimal impact on legitimate queries. Extensive experiments show that RADEP effectively defends against model extraction attacks and remains resilient even against adaptive adversaries, making it a reliable security framework for MLaaS models.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 13 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2025.

Builds on

13 of 21 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  3. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 666
  4. 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
  5. 2018Knockoff Nets: Stealing Functionality of Black-Box Modelscited by 292
  6. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 248
  7. 2018PRADA: Protecting against DNN Model Stealing Attackscited by 165
  8. 2018Adversarial Active Learning for Deep Networks: a Margin Based Approachcited by 158
  9. 2020Data-Free Model Extractioncited by 124
  10. 2019DAWN: Dynamic Adversarial Watermarking of Neural Networkscited by 100
  11. 2019Defending Against Model Stealing Attacks with Adaptive Misinformationcited by 57
  12. 2023MIA-BAD: An Approach for Enhancing Membership Inference Attack and its Mitigation with Federated Learningcited by 7
1 more
  1. 2024Accuracy-Privacy Trade-off in the Mitigation of Membership Inference Attack in Federated Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025HoneypotNet: Backdoor Attacks Against Model Extraction
  2. 2023Elevating Defenses: Bridging Adversarial Training and Watermarking for Model Resilience
  3. 2026Defending against Model Extraction for GNNs with Model Reprogramming
  4. 2024ModelShield: Adaptive and Robust Watermark against Model Extraction Attack
  5. 2023Identifying Appropriate Intellectual Property Protection Mechanisms for Machine Learning Models: A Systematization of Watermarking, Fingerprinting, Model Access, and Attacks
  6. 2023AdaptGuard: Defending Against Universal Attacks for Model Adaptation
  7. 2026Lifecycle-Aware Dynamic Analysis for Secure ML Model Execution
  8. 2025ATOM: A Framework of Detecting Query-Based Model Extraction Attacks for Graph Neural Networks