Intellectual Property Protection for Deep Learning Model and Dataset Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the growing applications of Deep Learning (DL), especially recent spectacular achievements of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and LLaMA, the commercial significance of these remarkable models has soared. However, acquiring well-trained models is costly and resource-intensive. It requires a considerable high-quality dataset, substantial investment in dedicated architecture design, expensive computational resources, and efforts to develop technical expertise. Consequently, safeguarding the Intellectual Property (IP) of well-trained models is attracting increasing attention. In contrast to existing surveys overwhelmingly focusing on model IPP mainly, this survey not only encompasses the protection on model level intelligence but also valuable dataset intelligence. Firstly, according to the requirements for effective IPP design, this work systematically summarizes the general and scheme-specific performance evaluation metrics. Secondly, from proactive IP infringement prevention and reactive IP ownership verification perspectives, it comprehensively investigates and analyzes the existing IPP methods for both dataset and model intelligence. Additionally, from the standpoint of training settings, it delves into the unique challenges that distributed settings pose to IPP compared to centralized settings. Furthermore, this work examines various attacks faced by deep IPP techniques. Finally, we outline prospects for promising future directions that may act as a guide for innovative research.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2024.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025DOGe: Defensive Output Generation for LLM Protection Against Knowledge Distillationcited by 14
- 2025Toward Robust Non-Transferable Learning: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 7
- 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 2
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarkingcited by 0
- 2026ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Stemma: Induced Decision Regions Reveal LLM Provenancecited by 0
- 2026Stemma: Induced Decision Regions Reveal LLM Provenance28 Jul 2026
- 2026ADS-C: Antidistillation Sampling for Classification16 Jul 2026
- 2025MarkTune: Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in Open-Weight LLM Watermarking3 Dec 2025
- 2025DOGe: Defensive Output Generation for LLM Protection Against Knowledge Distillation26 May 2025
- 2025Towards Dataset Copyright Evasion Attack against Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Models5 May 2025
- 2025Toward Robust Non-Transferable Learning: A Survey and Benchmark19 Feb 2025