Leveraging Instruction Tuning and Merging for Reasoning Model Adaptation
On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Reasoning language models (RLMs) demonstrate impressive performance by leveraging test-time compute in the form of reasoning tokens. However, this behavior makes adapting RLMs to new domains challenging and expensive. The reason is that further training can disturb the learned behavior and degrade model performance. This makes it difficult to leverage supervised fine-tuning data with human-written solutions: although it contains high-quality annotations, it lacks reasoning tokens. In this work, we show how, despite this challenge, such data can be used efficiently for RLM adaptation. For this, we first use standard instruction tuning. Next, we leverage model merging to combine the instruction-tuned model with the original RLM, picking the merging ratio such that the resulting model's reasoning behavior on the target domain is recovered. We evaluate our method across four RLMs on coding and text summarization tasks, where it improves target-task performance by up to 11.0% while preserving reasoning behavior and limiting the out-of-distribution score degradation to on average 0.7%. Importantly, our adaptations are efficient and economical, costing less than USD 10 per model.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 48 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.
Builds on
48 of 74 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2025What Can You Do When You Have Zero Rewards During RL?4 Oct
- 2025Learning What Reinforcement Learning Can't: Interleaved Online Fine-Tuning for Hardest Questions9 Jun
- 2025Reinforcing General Reasoning without Verifiers27 May
- 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training22 Nov
- 2023Let's Verify Step by Step31 May
Other references · 43
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
31 more
- 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2023On-Policy Distillation of Language Models: Learning from Self-Generated Mistakescited by 840
- 2023TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging Modelscited by 795
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 666
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2023RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI Feedbackcited by 615
- 2021Merging Models with Fisher-Weighted Averagingcited by 613
- 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 484
- 2015Policy Distillationcited by 414
- 2022Unnatural Instructions: Tuning Language Models with (Almost) No Human Laborcited by 395
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 287
- 2024To CoT or not to CoT? Chain-of-thought helps mainly on math and symbolic reasoningcited by 257
- 2024Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunitiescited by 247
- 2026Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learningcited by 212
- 2024Arcee's MergeKit: A Toolkit for Merging Large Language Modelscited by 189
- 2023OctoPack: Instruction Tuning Code Large Language Modelscited by 178
- 2025Generalizing Verifiable Instruction Followingcited by 178
- 2022MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generationcited by 132
- 2025REASONING GYM: Reasoning Environments for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewardscited by 121
- 2025Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RLcited by 111
- 2024Instruction Tuning for Secure Code Generationcited by 63
- 2024Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Language Transfer via Model Mergingcited by 36
- 2024On the Impact of Fine-Tuning on Chain-of-Thought Reasoningcited by 32
- 2026SpecBench: Measuring Reward Hacking in Long-Horizon Coding Agentscited by 25
- 2025ScaleRTL: Scaling LLMs with Reasoning Data and Test-Time Compute for Accurate RTL Code Generationcited by 22
- 2024Safeguard Fine-Tuned LLMs Through Pre- and Post-Tuning Model Mergingcited by 11
- 2024Unconstrained Model Merging for Enhanced LLM Reasoningcited by 7
- 2025The Thinking Spectrum: An Empirical Study of Tunable Reasoning in LLMs through Model Mergingcited by 4
- 2026Reasoning-Trace Collapse: Evaluating the Loss of Explicit Reasoning During Fine-Tuningcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Motif-2-12.7B-Reasoning: A Practitioner's Guide to RL Training Recipes
- 2025An Empirical Study on Eliciting and Improving R1-like Reasoning Models
- 2025Revisiting Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning from A Cross-Domain Perspective
- 2025Effective Learning for Small Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study on 0.5B Reasoning LLMs
- 2024MAmmoTH2: Scaling Instructions from the Web
- 2025A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models
- 2025RL Squeezes, SFT Expands: A Comparative Study of Reasoning LLMs
- 2025Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM Reasoning