MCPEvol-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agent Performance Across Dynamic Evolutions of MCP Servers
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Tool learning and function calling
Abstract (arXiv)
As Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers emerge as the core infrastructure for connecting LLMs with external tools, existing benchmarks leverage real-world MCP servers to evaluate LLM agents' tool-using capabilities. However, these benchmarks overlook the continuous evolution of tool interfaces and functionalities within MCP servers, resulting in flawed assessments that fail to capture the agent's adaptability in changing tool landscapes. To bridge this gap, we introduce MCPEvol-Bench, a novel benchmark for evaluating the task-solving capabilities of LLM agents under dynamic toolset evolution. Inspired by large-scale empirical study, we propose 11 mutation operators to simulate realistic tool evolution within 123 MCP servers. We benchmark 12 state-of-the-art LLMs on multiple versions of MCP servers, revealing that even frontier models struggle to adapt to evolving tools. For instance, GPT-5.4 and Claude-Sonnet-4-6 exhibit performance declines of 13.7% and 14.4% in evolved MCP servers, respectively, accompanied by substantial increases in planning and reasoning errors. These findings highlight the vulnerability of LLM-driven workflows, establishing MCPEvol-Bench as a standard for evaluating agent adaptability in dynamic tool environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2026.
Builds on
30 of 40 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2025MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Servers28 Aug
- 2025LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools?3 Aug
- 2025MCPEval: Automatic MCP-based Deep Evaluation for AI Agent Models17 Jul
- 2024ToolACE: Winning the Points of LLM Function Calling2 Sep
- 2024APIGen: Automated Pipeline for Generating Verifiable and Diverse Function-Calling Datasets26 Jun
- 2024Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey28 May
- 2024StableToolBench: Towards Stable Large-Scale Benchmarking on Tool Learning of Large Language Models12 Mar
- 2023ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs31 Jul
- 2023ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Cases8 Jun
Other references · 21
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,796
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2023WebArena: A Realistic Web Environment for Building Autonomous Agentscited by 2,006
- 2024OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environmentscited by 1,195
- 2021CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and Generationcited by 906
- 2024StarCoder 2 and The Stack v2: The Next Generationcited by 502
- 2024Agent Workflow Memorycited by 383
9 more
- 2024OS-ATLAS: A Foundation Action Model for Generalist GUI Agentscited by 378
- 2024JudgeBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Judgescited by 318
- 2025Plan-and-Act: Improving Planning of Agents for Long-Horizon Taskscited by 195
- 2025Agentic Large Language Models, a surveycited by 108
- 2026AgentRx: Diagnosing AI Agent Failures from Execution Trajectoriescited by 60
- 2024ShortcutsBench: A Large-Scale Real-world Benchmark for API-based Agentscited by 36
- 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge for Image Safety without Human Labelingcited by 23
- 2025RepoMaster: Autonomous Exploration and Understanding of GitHub Repositories for Complex Task Solvingcited by 19
- 2026TrajAD: Trajectory Anomaly Detection for Trustworthy LLM Agentscited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025ScaleMCP: Dynamic and Auto-Synchronizing Model Context Protocol Tools for LLM Agents
- 2025ETOM: A Five-Level Benchmark for Evaluating Tool Orchestration within the MCP Ecosystem
- 2026MCP-GRANITE Benchmark: GRANularity Interface TEsting for MCP-Based LLM Agents
- 2026DynamicMCPBench: A Trace-Grounded, Effect-Scored Benchmark for LLM Agents over Live MCP Servers
- 2025MCPAgentBench: A Real-world Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agent MCP Tool Use
- 2026EvoProbe: Evaluation-Driven Benchmark Evolution for LLM Agents
- 2025MCP-Flow: Facilitating LLM Agents to Master Real-World, Diverse and Scaling MCP Tools
- 2026MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers