mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VGIF-Score: Interpretable and Diagnostic Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Instruction Following in Video Generation

arXiv 2607.13527 ↗First posted 15 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent video generation models (VGMs) have made substantial progress in visual fidelity, yet their ability to follow long, compositional instructions remains insufficiently evaluated. Existing evaluation protocols often rely on prompts that are short and semantically shallow, with limited atomic constraints and weak spatio-temporal dependencies. They also frequently depend on costly human evaluation or handcrafted vision pipelines, while providing little diagnostic insight into which instruction constraints succeed or fail. To address this gap, we propose VGIF-Score, a highly automated and interpretable framework for evaluating instruction following in video generation. VGIF-Score consists of two complementary components: an objective completion branch that parses prompts into a Spatio-Temporal Directed Acyclic Graph (ST-DAG) and performs dependency-aware QA with short-circuit diagnostics, and a subjective satisfaction branch that uses instruction-conditioned AutoRubric to assess cinematography, visual purity, motion smoothness, and physics adherence. Together, these components produce a unified score that captures both objective completion and perceptual satisfaction. We instantiate this framework on VGIF-Bench, a benchmark of 223 long, structurally entangled prompts paired with approximately 4.3K fine-grained evaluation items. Experiments on 14 proprietary and open-source VGMs across more than 3K generated videos show that VGIF-Score provides reliable, interpretable, and diagnostically useful evaluation of video generation instruction following. The code will be available at https://github.com/PRIS-CV/VGIF-SCORE.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2026.

Builds on

36 of 44 references.

References · 36

  1. 2025Wan: Open and Advanced Large-Scale Video Generative Modelscited by 2,708
  2. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  3. 2022Video Diffusion Modelscited by 2,305
  4. 2024CogVideoX: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with An Expert Transformercited by 2,261
  5. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
  6. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  7. 2021VideoGPT: Video Generation using VQ-VAE and Transformerscited by 658
  8. 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 340
  9. 2025VBench-2.0: Advancing Video Generation Benchmark Suite for Intrinsic Faithfulnesscited by 315
  10. 2025MAGI-1: Autoregressive Video Generation at Scalecited by 276
  11. 2026LTX-2: Efficient Joint Audio-Visual Foundation Modelcited by 236
  12. 2024T2V-CompBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Compositional Text-to-video Generationcited by 185
24 more
  1. 2023Davidsonian Scene Graph: Improving Reliability in Fine-grained Evaluation for Text-to-Image Generationcited by 171
  2. 2025HunyuanVideo 1.5 Technical Reportcited by 160
  3. 2024GenAI-Bench: Evaluating and Improving Compositional Text-to-Visual Generationcited by 135
  4. 2025LongCat-Video Technical Reportcited by 85
  5. 2024ChronoMagic-Bench: A Benchmark for Metamorphic Evaluation of Text-to-Time-lapse Video Generationcited by 75
  6. 2025Kling-Omni Technical Reportcited by 71
  7. 2025VMBench: A Benchmark for Perception-Aligned Video Motion Generationcited by 49
  8. 2025InfinityStar: Unified Spacetime AutoRegressive Modeling for Visual Generationcited by 45
  9. 2024TC-Bench: Benchmarking Temporal Compositionality in Text-to-Video and Image-to-Video Generationcited by 43
  10. 2025Auto-Rubric: Learning From Implicit Weights to Explicit Rubrics for Reward Modelingcited by 30
  11. 2025CineTechBench: A Benchmark for Cinematographic Technique Understanding and Generationcited by 23
  12. 2025Toward Generalizable Forgery Detection and Reasoningcited by 20
  13. 2025T2VWorldBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating World Knowledge in Text-to-Video Generationcited by 19
  14. 2025MJ-VIDEO: Fine-Grained Benchmarking and Rewarding Video Preferences in Video Generationcited by 16
  15. 2024CLIP-AGIQA: Boosting the Performance of AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment with CLIPcited by 14
  16. 2025Uniform Discrete Diffusion with Metric Path for Video Generationcited by 12
  17. 2025Revisiting MLLM Based Image Quality Assessment: Errors and Remedycited by 7
  18. 2026Endogenous Reprompting: Self-Evolving Cognitive Alignment for Unified Multimodal Modelscited by 7
  19. 2025Multimodal Conditional Information Bottleneck for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detectioncited by 5
  20. 2026EvalVerse: Pipeline-Aware and Expert-Calibrated Benchmarking for Professional Cinematic Video Generationcited by 5
  21. 2026IncreFA: Breaking the Static Wall of Generative Model Attributioncited by 3
  22. 2026UDM-GRPO: Stable and Efficient Group Relative Policy Optimization for Uniform Discrete Diffusion Modelscited by 3
  23. 2026Seeing as Experts Do: A Knowledge-Augmented Agent for Open-Set Fine-Grained Visual Understandingcited by 2
  24. 2026DetailVerifyBench: A Benchmark for Dense Hallucination Localization in Long Image Captionscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.