mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science

arXiv 2607.13220 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2026cs.AI cs.CE cs.HCcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Most AI-for-science systems focus on scaling a single reasoning process by using better models, larger context windows, long-horizon agentic execution, or digital co-scientists working with one principal user. However, challenging scientific problems are rarely solved by one reasoner alone. They are solved by teams whose members carry different priors, experimental background, tacit knowledge, and domain-trained intuitions. The open problem is therefore not only how to scale models, but how to develop "networked intelligence", scaling the connections between humans and AI systems so that a result or hypothesis produced in one context reaches another person, agent, instrument or robot that can act on it. We introduce Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents. As human users and agents work, the system captures important observations and hypotheses, tracks how they relate to the team's evolving knowledge model, and routes them to the person or agent whose next decision they can inform. We evaluate Mycelium through a real-world scientific discovery use case: a biological multi-omics campaign where shared context turned a local analytical finding into a cross-expert mechanistic constraint and ultimately into an experimental design. Finally, we describe networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts. This framework establishes when a scaled standalone agent is sufficient, and when isolated data and specialized expertise make a networked approach essential.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2026.

Builds on

18 of 48 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  2. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
  3. 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,193
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2025Mem0: Building Production-Ready AI Agents with Scalable Long-Term Memorycited by 722
  6. 2023ChemCrow: Augmenting large-language models with chemistry toolscited by 609
  7. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 424
  8. 2025Memory in the Age of AI Agentscited by 285
  9. 2024ScienceAgentBench: Toward Rigorous Assessment of Language Agents for Data-Driven Scientific Discoverycited by 208
  10. 2024Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agentscited by 117
  11. 2023ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language Modelscited by 97
  12. 2025BixBench: a Comprehensive Benchmark for LLM-based Agents in Computational Biologycited by 75
6 more
  1. 2025Agentic AI for Scientific Discovery: A Survey of Progress, Challenges, and Future Directionscited by 74
  2. 2024ChemReasoner: Heuristic Search over a Large Language Model's Knowledge Space using Quantum-Chemical Feedbackcited by 32
  3. 2021Packaging research artefacts with RO-Cratecited by 22
  4. 2025Empowering Scientific Workflows with Federated Agentscited by 16
  5. 2025Osprey: Production-Ready Agentic AI for Safety-Critical Control Systemscited by 4
  6. 2026Graph of Trace: Visualizing Execution Traces of Scientific Agentcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Position: AI Agents in Scientific Teams Should Be Studied as Human-Agent Systems
  2. 2024SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning
  3. 2026Harnessing the Collective Intelligence of AI Agents in the Wild for New Discoveries
  4. 2026MACC: Multi-Agent Collaborative Competition for Scientific Exploration
  5. 2026Science Earth: Towards A Planet-Scale Operating System for AI-Native Scientific Discovery
  6. 2025Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science
  7. 2025SciSciGPT: Advancing Human-AI Collaboration in the Science of Science
  8. 2025ToolUniverse: An open platform for democratizing AI scientists