mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Science Earth: Towards A Planet-Scale Operating System for AI-Native Scientific Discovery

arXiv 2606.01316 ↗First posted 31 May 2026cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific discovery demands intelligence, perseverance, and serendipity across vast search spaces. Today, top scientific capabilities remain siloed--one AI system for biological analysis, another for clinical reasoning, mathematical derivation, or materials simulation--and no pre-designed team can anticipate every skill a question will need. Science Earth is a planet-scale scientific runtime in which any capability--a simulation cluster, a wet-lab robot, a proof engine, a single-cell pipeline--can connect to any other, with collaboration structure emerging from the question itself. Its underlying EACN protocol lets capabilities discover one another, negotiate task ownership, and adjudicate across incompatible evidentiary standards without prior knowledge of who will meet whom. This shifts the organizing challenge from workflow design to open-ended connectivity. Two runs validate this under structurally distinct conditions. In a trans-Pacific higher-order Kuramoto synchronization study, agents identified and corrected a closure-ratio assumption in Ott-Antonsen analytic theory that fails outside the Lorentzian limit, within thirty minutes. In an eight-agent single-cell run on the 4.88M-cell Kang 2024 pan-cancer atlas, heterogeneous capabilities coupled over a 64.9-hour window with one structural external instruction, producing three new result layers and anchoring findings against an independent wet-lab study on an adjacent CCR8- TIGIT+ Treg subset. These cases are a first empirical reading, not a benchmark sweep. They show that when AI capabilities are truly connectable and coordination emerges from the problem, scientific reasoning becomes a distributed, self-correcting process--a step towards scaling AI-native discovery to the planet.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2026.

Builds on

24 of 67 references.

References · 24

  1. 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
  2. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  3. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  4. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  5. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  6. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  7. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,582
  8. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  9. 2023HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Facecited by 1,173
  10. 2023Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debatecited by 995
  11. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Developmentcited by 893
  12. 2023AgentVerse: Facilitating Multi-Agent Collaboration and Exploring Emergent Behaviorscited by 580
12 more
  1. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 405
  2. 2023SOTOPIA: Interactive Evaluation for Social Intelligence in Language Agentscited by 350
  3. 2024Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Taskscited by 221
  4. 2022MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoningcited by 153
  5. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Researchcited by 150
  6. 2020Networks beyond pairwise interactions: structure and dynamicscited by 127
  7. 2024AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platformcited by 120
  8. 2024AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write Surveyscited by 116
  9. 2025SurveyForge: On the Outline Heuristics, Memory-Driven Generation, and Multi-dimensional Evaluation for Automated Survey Writingcited by 47
  10. 2026ARIS: Autonomous Research via Adversarial Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 12
  11. 2025LabOS: The AI-XR Co-Scientist That Sees and Works With Humanscited by 7
  12. 2025When higher-order interactions enhance synchronization: the case of the Kuramoto modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents
  2. 2025From AI for Science to Agentic Science: A Survey on Autonomous Scientific Discovery
  3. 2026InternAgent-1.5: A Unified Agentic Framework for Long-Horizon Autonomous Scientific Discovery
  4. 2026Networked Intelligence: Active Shared Context Graphs for Human-AI Team Science
  5. 2025Autonomous Agents for Scientific Discovery: Orchestrating Scientists, Language, Code, and Physics
  6. 2025Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists
  7. 2025Virtuous Machines: Towards Artificial General Science
  8. 2025ScienceBoard: Evaluating Multimodal Autonomous Agents in Realistic Scientific Workflows