mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Critic Experience Bank: Self-Evolving Step-Level Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents

arXiv 2607.12397 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2026cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

LLM agents operate in stateful environments, where a single erroneous step can waste limited interaction budget or cause irreversible effects before task failure becomes apparent. Reliable deployment therefore requires step-level confidence estimation: estimating, before execution, the probability that a proposed action will advance the task. Existing LLM confidence estimators are typically designed for static question answering under a fixed task context and evaluation criterion. For an agent, however, its action productivity depends on an environment transition that is observed only after execution. To address this challenge, we introduce Critic Experience Bank (CEB), a training-free framework that turns feedback from completed trajectories into reusable evidence for future confidence judgments. After each trajectory, an LLM assigns hindsight productivity pseudo-labels to individual actions and stores them with the critic's original pre-execution confidence, task context, action, and observed feedback. For a new action, by retrieving related productive and unproductive experiences, CEB grounds pre-execution confidence in feedback from completed trajectories to condition a fixed LLM critic. CEB thereby adapts over a task stream without parameter updates or ground-truth step labels at deployment. Across four agent benchmarks spanning offline and live web navigation, mobile GUI and shell tasks, and three critic backbones, CEB achieves the best or tied-best ECE, Brier score, and AUC in all twelve benchmark-backbone settings under rule-based step labels, reducing ECE by up to 53.8% relative to the strongest training-free baseline. Its confidence scores also improve downstream utility in selective execution and simulated task success.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 30 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2026.

Builds on

30 of 31 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential Learners20 Aug

Other references · 29

  1. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  4. 2023Let's Verify Step by Stepcited by 3,598
  5. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  6. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  7. 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
  8. 2023Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Webcited by 1,210
  9. 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
  10. 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
  11. 2023CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquingcited by 751
  12. 2025ReasoningBank: Scaling Agent Self-Evolving with Reasoning Memorycited by 253
17 more
  1. 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 229
  2. 2024WebCanvas: Benchmarking Web Agents in Online Environmentscited by 119
  3. 2024AMEX: Android Multi-annotation Expo Dataset for Mobile GUI Agentscited by 110
  4. 2025How Memory Management Impacts LLM Agents: An Empirical Study of Experience-Following Behaviorcited by 95
  5. 2025Web-Shepherd: Advancing PRMs for Reinforcing Web Agentscited by 41
  6. 2025STeCa: Step-level Trajectory Calibration for LLM Agent Learningcited by 37
  7. 2024Do LLMs estimate uncertainty well in instruction-following?cited by 26
  8. 2025Calibrating LLM Confidence by Probing Perturbed Representation Stabilitycited by 23
  9. 2025Your Pre-trained LLM is Secretly an Unsupervised Confidence Calibratorcited by 19
  10. 2025Know What You Don't Know: Uncertainty Calibration of Process Reward Modelscited by 19
  11. 2025MICE for CATs: Model-Internal Confidence Estimation for Calibrating Agents with Toolscited by 15
  12. 2025E-valuator: Reliable Agent Verifiers with Sequential Hypothesis Testingcited by 14
  13. 2026The Art of Building Verifiers for Computer Use Agentscited by 11
  14. 2025Self-Evaluating LLMs for Multi-Step Tasks: Stepwise Confidence Estimation for Failure Detectioncited by 6
  15. 2025Uncertainty in Action: Confidence Elicitation in Embodied Agentscited by 5
  16. 2025Probabilities Are All You Need: A Probability-Only Approach to Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Modelscited by 5
  17. 2026Guideline-Grounded Evidence Accumulation for High-Stakes Agent Verificationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026BenchTrace: A Benchmark for Testing Reflection Ability and Controlled Evolution in LLM Agents
  2. 2026Learn Now, Use Next, Trust Later: Prequential Test-Time Learning for LLM Agents
  3. 2026Confidence Reasoning Graphs: Structured Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents
  4. 2026Accurate Failure Prediction in Agents Does Not Imply Effective Failure Prevention
  5. 2026Rethinking Self-Evolving Agent Skills: Feedback Dynamics over Multiple Rounds
  6. 2026From Memory to Skills: Evidence-Grounded Co-Evolution Governance for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
  7. 2026Bayesian-Agent: Posterior-Guided Skill Evolution Across LLM Agent Harnesses
  8. 2026SEAGym: An Evaluation Environment for Self-Evolving LLM Agents