Probabilities Are All You Need: A Probability-Only Approach to Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong performance across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks but remain vulnerable to hallucinations, generating factually incorrect or misleading outputs. Uncertainty estimation, often using predictive entropy estimation, is key to addressing this issue. However, existing methods often require multiple samples or extra computation to assess semantic entropy. This paper proposes an efficient, training-free uncertainty estimation method that approximates predictive entropy using the responses' top-K probabilities. Moreover, we employ an adaptive mechanism to determine K to enhance flexibility and filter out low-confidence probabilities. Experimental results on three free-form question-answering datasets across several LLMs demonstrate that our method outperforms expensive state-of-the-art baselines, contributing to the broader goal of enhancing LLM trustworthiness.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2025.
Builds on
12 of 25 references.
References · 12
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 742
- 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
- 2021On Hallucination and Predictive Uncertainty in Conditional Language Generationcited by 176
- 2024Kernel Language Entropy: Fine-grained Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs from Semantic Similaritiescited by 156
- 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 140
- 2022Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 67
- 2024MARS: Meaning-Aware Response Scoring for Uncertainty Estimation in Generative LLMscited by 45
- 2025Enhancing Reasoning to Adapt Large Language Models for Domain-Specific Applicationscited by 8
- 2025Investigating Symbolic Triggers of Hallucination in Gemma Models Across HaluEval and TruthfulQAcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
5 papers.
- 2026Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retentioncited by 4
- 2026The Alignment Tax: Response Homogenization in Aligned LLMs and Its Implications for Uncertainty Estimationcited by 4
- 2026Beyond Majority Voting: Efficient Best-Of-N with Radial Consensus Scorecited by 2
- 2026Critic Experience Bank: Self-Evolving Step-Level Confidence Estimation for LLM Agentscited by 2
- 2025Distance Is All You Need: Radial Dispersion for Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Critic Experience Bank: Self-Evolving Step-Level Confidence Estimation for LLM Agents14 Jul 2026
- 2026Beyond Majority Voting: Efficient Best-Of-N with Radial Consensus Score14 Apr 2026
- 2026The Alignment Tax: Response Homogenization in Aligned LLMs and Its Implications for Uncertainty Estimation25 Mar 2026
- 2026Hear Both Sides: Efficient Multi-Agent Debate via Diversity-Aware Message Retention21 Mar 2026
- 2025Distance Is All You Need: Radial Dispersion for Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models4 Dec 2025