mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Metadata-Free Meta-Reweighted Direct Preference Optimization under Noisy Preference Labels

arXiv 2607.09796 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become an important method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because it removes the need for explicit reward modeling and reinforcement learning. However, its performance depends heavily on the quality of preference data, and noisy preference data in real-world settings can weaken alignment performance. To address this issue, we propose a bilevel optimization framework and prove, under some idealized conditions, that this framework can recover the DPO optimum under clean data. We further derive a prior form for the learnable weighting function under label-flipping noise. Considering that high-quality metadata may be difficult to obtain, we propose a prompt augmentation consistency method that enables meta-learning even when metadata is completely unavailable. To reduce the high cost of higher-order gradients in LLM meta-learning, we combine central-difference approximation with LoRA fine-tuning and develop a scalable training scheme. Experiments on TL;DR summarization and Anthropic Helpful and Harmless dialogue show that the proposed method improves alignment performance over multiple DPO baselines under different noise rates.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 22 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

22 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 6

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Towards Robust Alignment of Language Models: Distributionally Robustifying Direct Preference Optimization10 Jul
  2. 2024Impact of Preference Noise on the Alignment Performance of Generative Language Models15 Apr
  3. 2024ROPO: Robust Preference Optimization for Large Language Models5 Apr
  4. 2024Provably Robust DPO: Aligning Language Models with Noisy Feedback1 Mar
  5. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
  6. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 16

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  6. 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
  7. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  8. 2020Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 944
  9. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  10. 2018Bilevel Programming for Hyperparameter Optimization and Meta-Learningcited by 403
  11. 2023A Survey of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 259
  12. 2023Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPOcited by 226
4 more
  1. 2024Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part II: Reward Modelingcited by 170
  2. 2024Robust Reinforcement Learning from Corrupted Human Feedbackcited by 25
  3. 2022CMW-Net: Learning a Class-Aware Sample Weighting Mapping for Robust Deep Learningcited by 24
  4. 2023DAC-MR: Data Augmentation Consistency Based Meta-Regularization for Meta-Learningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
  2. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  3. 2026Towards Bridging the Gap Between Offline and Iterative Alignment via Preference Distillation
  4. 2026Meta-Aligner: Bidirectional Preference-Policy Optimization for Multi-Objective LLMs Alignment
  5. 2025Alignment through Meta-Weighted Online Sampling: Bridging the Gap between Data Generation and Preference Optimization
  6. 2026From RLHF to Direct Alignment: A Theoretical Unification of Preference Learning for Large Language Models
  7. 2024Towards Improved Preference Optimization Pipeline: from Data Generation to Budget-Controlled Regularization
  8. 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment