mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vision Transformers Learn Gestalt-Like Figure-Ground Cues from Natural Images

arXiv 2607.08932 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Figure-ground organization in the human visual system relies on several shape-based cues, including surroundedness, convexity, and symmetry. While these cues have been extensively studied using abstract stimuli, little is known about how they operate under natural conditions or how they arise from the statistics of natural scenes. Deep neural networks offer a promising path forward: a model that relies on the same figure-ground cues as humans would provide tractable experimental access to the underlying mechanisms. In this study, we evaluate shape-based figure-ground organization in Vision Transformers (ViTs), for which prior work has demonstrated the emergence of object-based grouping. We test 25 ViTs spanning supervised and self-supervised training objectives, by fitting linear probes to predict figure-ground assignment from intermediate patch representations using both natural images and controlled artificial stimuli that isolate individual cues. Our results show that ViTs robustly encode surroundedness and convexity, and that probes trained on natural images generalize zero-shot to artificial stimuli across several models. For symmetry we observe mixed results: the cue is encoded for uniformly colored but not for textured regions. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that Gestalt-like figure-ground cues can be learned from natural scene statistics and position ViTs as a compelling model system for studying the computational mechanisms of perceptual organization. Code and data is available at https://github.com/mtangemann/mlvbench

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.

Builds on

38 of 59 references.

References · 38

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  4. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  5. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  6. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  7. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  8. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  9. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
  10. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  11. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  12. 2025SigLIP 2: Multilingual Vision-Language Encoders with Improved Semantic Understanding, Localization, and Dense Featurescited by 1,127
26 more
  1. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 891
  2. 2023Scaling Vision Transformers to 22 Billion Parameterscited by 690
  3. 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
  4. 2022DeiT III: Revenge of the ViTcited by 417
  5. 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 377
  6. 2025Perception Encoder: The best visual embeddings are not at the output of the networkcited by 315
  7. 2021Localizing Objects with Self-Supervised Transformers and no Labelscited by 227
  8. 2024Probing the 3D Awareness of Visual Foundation Modelscited by 175
  9. 2022Self-Supervised Transformers for Unsupervised Object Discovery using Normalized Cutcited by 166
  10. 2022FlexiViT: One Model for All Patch Sizescited by 151
  11. 2020Beyond accuracy: quantifying trial-by-trial behaviour of CNNs and humans by measuring error consistencycited by 77
  12. 2025Does Object Binding Naturally Emerge in Large Pretrained Vision Transformers?cited by 19
  13. 2024DepthCues: Evaluating Monocular Depth Perception in Large Vision Modelscited by 18
  14. 2025ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppressioncited by 13
  15. 2022Mixed Evidence for Gestalt Grouping in Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  16. 2024Probing the Mid-level Vision Capabilities of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 7
  17. 2025From Local Cues to Global Percepts: Emergent Gestalt Organization in Self-Supervised Vision Modelscited by 7
  18. 2025Contour Integration Underlies Human-Like Visioncited by 6
  19. 2024Object segmentation from common fate: Motion energy processing enables human-like zero-shot generalization to random dot stimulicited by 5
  20. 2019Evaluating CNNs on the Gestalt Principle of Closurecited by 4
  21. 2023Infinite dSprites for Disentangled Continual Learning: Separating Memory Edits from Generalizationcited by 3
  22. 2024Finding Closure: A Closer Look at the Gestalt Law of Closure in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
  23. 2024Investigating the Gestalt Principle of Closure in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 3
  24. 2023Degraded Polygons Raise Fundamental Questions of Neural Network Perceptioncited by 1
  25. 2025Machine Learning Modeling for Multi-order Human Visual Motion Processingcited by 1
  26. 2026Human-like Object Grouping in Self-supervised Vision Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.