mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Finding Closure: A Closer Look at the Gestalt Law of Closure in Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv 2408.12460 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The human brain has an inherent ability to fill in gaps to perceive figures as complete wholes, even when parts are missing or fragmented. This phenomenon is known as Closure in psychology, one of the Gestalt laws of perceptual organization, explaining how the human brain interprets visual stimuli. Given the importance of Closure for human object recognition, we investigate whether neural networks rely on a similar mechanism. Exploring this crucial human visual skill in neural networks has the potential to highlight their comparability to humans. Recent studies have examined the Closure effect in neural networks. However, they typically focus on a limited selection of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and have not reached a consensus on their capability to perform Closure. To address these gaps, we present a systematic framework for investigating the Closure principle in neural networks. We introduce well-curated datasets designed to test for Closure effects, including both modal and amodal completion. We then conduct experiments on various CNNs employing different measurements. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that VGG16 and DenseNet-121 exhibit the Closure effect, while other CNNs show variable results. We interpret these findings by blending insights from psychology and neural network research, offering a unique perspective that enhances transparency in understanding neural networks. Our code and dataset will be made available on GitHub.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 48 references.

References · 17

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  6. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  9. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  10. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  11. 2017ShuffleNet: An Extremely Efficient Convolutional Neural Network for Mobile Devicescited by 1,194
  12. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
5 more
  1. 2022Mixed Evidence for Gestalt Grouping in Deep Neural Networkscited by 11
  2. 2018Understanding Deep Convolutional Networks through Gestalt Theorycited by 8
  3. 2024MindSet: Vision. A toolbox for testing DNNs on key psychological experimentscited by 8
  4. 2019Evaluating CNNs on the Gestalt Principle of Closurecited by 4
  5. 2023Latent Noise Segmentation: How Neural Noise Leads to the Emergence of Segmentation and Groupingcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.