ProACT: Towards Breakdown-Aware Proactive Agent in Multi-User Collaboration
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks
Abstract (arXiv)
Conversational agents are increasingly embedded in human collaborative work, yet they remain fundamentally passive and reactive: they respond to explicit user requests rather than proactively recognizing moments when a team would benefit from timely intervention as human collaborators often do. This reactive design substantially limits the use of agents as active participants in multi-user collaboration, where disagreements, ambiguous goals, forgotten constraints, underspecified plans, discussion loops, and imbalanced participation can gradually undermine group progress. To move agents from passive assistants toward active participants in multi-user collaboration, we introduce ProACT, a breakdown-aware agent framework grounded in theories of common ground, collaborative planning, and coordination work. ProACT observes the speaker-attributed conversation history, determines whether the current turn contains a collaboration breakdown requiring intervention, decides whether the agent should stay silent or speak, and, when speaking is needed, routes the case to a targeted collaboration skill. We further introduce the first multi-user collaboration benchmark for evaluating proactive agents across project planning, product design, research collaboration, logistics, education, and resource-constrained decision making. Across 3,244 turn-level examples and five LLM backbones, ProACT consistently improves collaborative appropriateness, non-interruptiveness, conciseness, and judged intervention quality over direct chat.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 10 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2026.
Builds on
10 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Proactive Agent: Shifting LLM Agents from Reactive Responses to Active Assistance16 Oct
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Society31 Mar
Other references · 8
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2021QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarizationcited by 365
- 2023Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology Viewcited by 222
- 2025PlanGenLLMs: A Modern Survey of LLM Planning Capabilitiescited by 83
- 2025Beyond a Million Tokens: Benchmarking and Enhancing Long-Term Memory in LLMscited by 60
- 2024Tell me what I need to know: Exploring LLM-based (Personalized) Abstractive Multi-Source Meeting Summarizationcited by 9
- 2025Can AI Truly Represent Your Voice in Deliberations? A Comprehensive Study of Large-Scale Opinion Aggregation with LLMscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Collaborative Gym: A Framework for Enabling and Evaluating Human-Agent Collaboration
- 2026π-Bench: Evaluating Proactive Personal Assistant Agents in Long-Horizon Workflows
- 2025UserBench: An Interactive Gym Environment for User-Centric Agents
- 2026ProAct: A Benchmark and Multimodal Framework for Structure-Aware Proactive Response
- 2025Beyond Frameworks: Unpacking Collaboration Strategies in Multi-Agent Systems
- 2026Humans' ALMANAC: A Human Collaboration Dataset of Action-Level Mental Model Annotations for Agent Collaboration
- 2026VitaBench 2.0: Evaluating Personalized and Proactive Agents in Long-Term User Interactions
- 2026DIG to Heal: Scaling General-purpose Agent Collaboration via Explainable Dynamic Decision Paths