CAGE-1: Control, Assurance, and Governance Evaluation for Enterprise Agentic AI
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise artificial intelligence is moving from experimentation into operational workflows. Early programs focused on model access and retrieval-augmented generation, but enterprises are now beginning to deploy agents that plan, retrieve, remember, call tools, update systems, and coordinate work across applications. This changes the evaluation problem. Leaders are no longer asking only whether an answer is accurate or fluent. They need to know who authorized an action, which policy applied, whether evidence was current, whether memory was valid, whether a tool call was permitted, whether the decision can be replayed, and whether the agent can be stopped before it creates business impact. This paper introduces CAGE-1: Control, Assurance, and Governance Evaluation for Enterprise Agentic AI. CAGE-1 is an evaluation framework for deciding whether enterprise agents are ready for deployment. It evaluates authority, policy enforcement, retrieval quality, memory integrity, tool safety, auditability, human oversight, conflict handling, safe failure, Prebind Assurance, operational readiness, and business fitness. CAGE-1 introduces Prebind Assurance to describe the evaluated ability to prove that an agentic action is controlled before it becomes binding, effective, or operationally consequential. The framework tests whether a proposed action is admitted, held, narrowed, refused, escalated, quarantined, or made non-effective before protected consequence forms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 2 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
2 of 15 references.
References · 2
- 2025Survey on Evaluation of LLM-based Agentscited by 190
- 2025Evaluation and Benchmarking of LLM Agents: A Surveycited by 145
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Beyond Task Success: An Evidence-Synthesis Framework for Evaluating, Governing, and Orchestrating Agentic AI
- 2025Beyond Accuracy: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Enterprise Agentic AI Systems
- 2026The CASE Framework: A Multi-Disciplinary Control Architecture for Governing Enterprise Agentic AI
- 2026Testing and Evaluation of Agentic AI Systems In Military Command and Control
- 2025Towards a Standard, Enterprise-Relevant Agentic AI Benchmark: Lessons from 5.5 billion tokens' worth of agentic AI evaluations
- 2026Continuous Process-Level Evaluation for Evolving Enterprise AI Agent Skills
- 2026Governing the Agentic Enterprise: A Governance Maturity Model for Managing AI Agent Sprawl in Business Operations
- 2026AGL-1: The Enterprise AI Governance Layer as a Control Plane for Trusted Enterprise Intelligence