mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SPLIT: Cross-Lingual Empathy and Cultural Grounding in English and Ukrainian LLM Responses

arXiv 2607.02049 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2026cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models are increasingly deployed in emotional-support contexts and crisis-related situations. Nevertheless, their cross-lingual abilities in these circumstances remain underexplored. Existing benchmarks emphasize multilingual performance but rarely examine crisis-related empathy and cultural grounding in low-to-mid-resource languages. We introduce SPLIT, a 500-prompt benchmark designed to evaluate LLM consistency in generating emotionally grounded responses across five categories: Stress, Panic, Loneliness, Internal Displacement, and Tension. We evaluate three technically diverse LLMs across three dimensions: Empathetic Accuracy, Linguistic Naturalness, and Contextual & Cultural Grounding. The framework aims to assess and compare the quality of LLM responses in both English and Ukrainian languages, as well as to explore the reliability of the LLM-as-a-jury paradigm. Our findings reveal that Gemini-2.5-Flash and LLaMA-3.3-70B-Instruct degrade when transitioning to Ukrainian, while DeepSeek-V3 remains comparatively stable within our benchmark. We additionally find that human and AI evaluators agree weakly on empathy and naturalness but diverge on cultural grounding. We further argue that producing Ukrainian text is not equivalent to producing Ukrainian emotional support. Our findings may assist in the future development of more culturally tailored benchmark designs, as well as encourage a stronger emphasis on human-centered evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.

Builds on

37 of 62 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  5. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  6. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 789
  7. 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 236
  8. 2024Auxiliary-Loss-Free Load Balancing Strategy for Mixture-of-Expertscited by 191
  9. 2023Cultural Alignment in Large Language Models: An Explanatory Analysis Based on Hofstede's Cultural Dimensionscited by 111
  10. 2024An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge for LLM Evaluation: Fine-tuned Judge Model is not a General Substitute for GPT-4cited by 90
  11. 2021Towards Facilitating Empathic Conversations in Online Mental Health Support: A Reinforcement Learning Approachcited by 75
  12. 2023EQ-Bench: An Emotional Intelligence Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 75
25 more
  1. 2025Evaluating Scoring Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 42
  2. 2025Multilingual != Multicultural: Evaluating Gaps Between Multilingual Capabilities and Cultural Alignment in LLMscited by 39
  3. 2024Putting GPT-4o to the Sword: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Language, Vision, Speech, and Multimodal Proficiencycited by 31
  4. 2025How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge?cited by 29
  5. 2025Judge's Verdict: A Comprehensive Analysis of LLM Judge Capability Through Human Agreementcited by 24
  6. 2025Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipelinecited by 20
  7. 2025MuBench: Assessment of Multilingual Capabilities of Large Language Models Across 61 Languagescited by 13
  8. 2024Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Empathetic Dialog Responsescited by 10
  9. 2026JudgeSense: A Benchmark for Prompt Sensitivity in LLM-as-a-Judge Systemscited by 10
  10. 2025Are LLMs Empathetic to All? Investigating the Influence of Multi-Demographic Personas on a Model's Empathycited by 9
  11. 2026Self-Preference Bias in Rubric-Based Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 9
  12. 2024Improbable Bigrams Expose Vulnerabilities of Incomplete Tokens in Byte-Level Tokenizerscited by 7
  13. 2026Judging the Judges: A Systematic Evaluation of Bias Mitigation Strategies in LLM-as-a-Judge Pipelinescited by 7
  14. 2025Understanding and Enhancing the Planning Capability of Language Models via Multi-Token Predictioncited by 6
  15. 2024Empathic Grounding: Explorations using Multimodal Interaction and Large Language Models with Conversational Agentscited by 5
  16. 2024Evaluating Knowledge-based Cross-lingual Inconsistency in Large Language Modelscited by 4
  17. 2026The Tokenizer Tax Across 25 European Languages: Domain Invariance, Cross-Lingual Few-Shot Effects, and the Ukrainian Penaltycited by 4
  18. 2025Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Automated News Article Summarizationcited by 2
  19. 2025Empowering Smaller Models: Tuning LLaMA and Gemma with Chain-of-Thought for Ukrainian Exam Taskscited by 2
  20. 2025Heartificial Intelligence: Exploring Empathy in Language Modelscited by 2
  21. 2025Bridging Minds and Machines: Toward an Integration of AI and Cognitive Sciencecited by 2
  22. 2025IndicParam: Benchmark to evaluate LLMs on low-resource Indic Languagescited by 2
  23. 2026Reducing Tokenization Premiums for Low-Resource Languagescited by 2
  24. 2025Cross-Lingual Stability and Bias in Instruction-Tuned Language Models for Humanitarian NLPcited by 1
  25. 2026Emotional intelligence in large language models is fragmented across perception, cognition, and interactioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.