mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-dimensional Evaluation of Empathetic Dialog Responses

arXiv 2402.11409 ↗First posted 18 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Empathy is critical for effective and satisfactory conversational communication. Prior efforts to measure conversational empathy mostly focus on expressed communicative intents -- that is, the way empathy is expressed. Yet, these works ignore the fact that conversation is also a collaboration involving both speakers and listeners. In contrast, we propose a multi-dimensional empathy evaluation framework to measure both expressed intents from the speaker's perspective and perceived empathy from the listener's perspective. We apply our analytical framework to examine internal customer-service dialogues. We find the two dimensions (expressed intent types and perceived empathy) are inter-connected, while perceived empathy has high correlations with dialogue satisfaction levels. To reduce the annotation cost, we explore different options to automatically measure conversational empathy: prompting LLMs and training language model-based classifiers. Our experiments show that prompting methods with even popular models like GPT-4 and Flan family models perform relatively poorly on both public and our internal datasets. In contrast, instruction-finetuned classifiers based on Flan-T5 family models outperform prior works and competitive baselines. We conduct a detailed ablation study to give more insights into instruction finetuning method's strong performance.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Feb 2024.

Builds on

15 of 54 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  3. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 3,024
  4. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  5. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
  6. 2021Towards Emotional Support Dialog Systemscited by 299
  7. 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 295
  8. 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
  9. 2020A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Supportcited by 182
  10. 2020A Taxonomy of Empathetic Response Intents in Human Social Conversationscited by 51
  11. 2021Perspective-taking and Pragmatics for Generating Empathetic Responses Focused on Emotion Causescited by 43
  12. 2022CONDAQA: A Contrastive Reading Comprehension Dataset for Reasoning about Negationcited by 39
3 more
  1. 2019Observing Dialogue in Therapy: Categorizing and Forecasting Behavioral Codescited by 25
  2. 2023An In-depth Investigation of User Response Simulation for Conversational Searchcited by 20
  3. 2019Evaluating Empathy in Artificial Agentscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

10 papers.