Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Automated News Article Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The automation of news analysis and summarization presents a promising solution to the challenge of processing and analyzing vast amounts of information prevalent in today's information society. Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the capability to transform vast amounts of textual data into concise and easily comprehensible summaries, offering an effective solution to the problem of information overload and providing users with a quick overview of relevant information. A particularly significant application of this technology lies in supply chain risk analysis. Companies must monitor the news about their suppliers and respond to incidents for several critical reasons, including compliance with laws and regulations, risk management, and maintaining supply chain resilience. This paper develops an automated news summarization system for supply chain risk analysis using LLMs. The proposed solution aggregates news from various sources, summarizes them using LLMs, and presents the condensed information to users in a clear and concise format. This approach enables companies to optimize their information processing and make informed decisions. Our study addresses two main research questions: (1) Are LLMs effective in automating news summarization, particularly in the context of supply chain risk analysis? (2) How effective are various LLMs in terms of readability, duplicate detection, and risk identification in their summarization quality? In this paper, we conducted an offline study using a range of publicly available LLMs at the time and complemented it with a user study focused on the top performing systems of the offline experiments to evaluate their effectiveness further. Our results demonstrate that LLMs, particularly Few-Shot GPT-4o mini, offer significant improvements in summary quality and risk identification.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2025.
Builds on
11 of 21 references.
References · 11
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
- 2019Text Summarization with Pretrained Encoderscited by 553
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models for News Summarizationcited by 444
- 2022Revisiting the Gold Standard: Grounding Summarization Evaluation with Robust Human Evaluationcited by 141
- 2023On Learning to Summarize with Large Language Models as Referencescited by 80
- 2024A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Modelscited by 52
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.