Evaluating Social Engineering Risks in AI-based Interaction using Biometrics and a Gaming Setup
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce AIriskEval-gaming, an open platform and dataset to evaluate social engineering risks in LLM-mediated multimodal interaction through controlled games. It supports human-human, human-AI and AI-AI settings, combining configurable game templates, role-conditioned LLM agents, psychology-informed participant profiling, structured interaction trees, and synchronized behavioral and biometric acquisition, filtering, and deep-learning-based feature extraction. The dataset (AIriskEval-gaming-db) was collected from 15 participants who interacted with a role-conditioned GPT-5.4 agent in two concatenated games: an adapted Prisoner's Dilemma and an Ultimatum Game. It comprises 340 GB of raw and processed multimodal data across six streams: interaction logs, video, screen recordings, gaze logs, smartwatch signals, and game/questionnaire metadata. These data include interaction paths, written justifications, psychological profiles, subjective feedback, perceived counterpart identity, game outcomes, and derived behavioral, facial, and gaze features. Alongside the dataset, we provide descriptive analyses characterizing the resulting multimodal data. Rigorous risk evaluation is essential for the deployment of secure AI systems, as it enables the identification and mitigation of vulnerabilities, ensures the protection of sensitive data, and supports compliance with evolving regulatory and ethical standards in society. The dataset and related code are available on GitHub.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.
5 papers.
- 2026Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyondcited by 4
- 2026AIriskEval-edu: New Dataset for Risk Assessment in AI-mediated K-12 Educational Explanationscited by 3
- 2026Comparative Study of Domain-adapted VLMs for General Document Visual Question Answeringcited by 3
- 2026AIriskEval-edu Demo: Auditing of Pedagogical Risks in Educational Explanationscited by 0
- 2026inLoRA-MINT: Internal Representations for Auditing Training Data in Domain-adapted LLMscited by 0
- 2026inLoRA-MINT: Internal Representations for Auditing Training Data in Domain-adapted LLMs13 Oct 2026
- 2026AIriskEval-edu Demo: Auditing of Pedagogical Risks in Educational Explanations28 Jul 2026
- 2026Comparative Study of Domain-adapted VLMs for General Document Visual Question Answering8 Jul 2026
- 2026Overview of Risk Assessment and Management for Intelligent Systems under the AI Act and Beyond2 Jul 2026
- 2026AIriskEval-edu: New Dataset for Risk Assessment in AI-mediated K-12 Educational Explanations2 Jul 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Do LLM Agents Exhibit Social Behavior?
- 2024AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents
- 2025Personalized Attacks of Social Engineering in Multi-turn Conversations: LLM Agents for Simulation and Detection
- 2025On the Feasibility of Using MultiModal LLMs to Execute AR Social Engineering Attacks
- 2026Communicate-Predict-Act: Evaluating Social Intelligence of Agents
- 2026AICompanionBench: Benchmarking LLMs-as-Judges for AI Companion Safety
- 2024MMRole: A Comprehensive Framework for Developing and Evaluating Multimodal Role-Playing Agents
- 2024SocialBench: Sociality Evaluation of Role-Playing Conversational Agents