Adaptive Group-Based Counterfactual Explanations for Time-Series Rehabilitation Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Counterfactual explanations (CEs) for multivariate time-series classifiers are often difficult to interpret in domains where experts reason in terms of semantic feature groups rather than individual channels. In rehabilitation movement analysis with multi-sensor inertial measurement units (IMUs), clinicians interpret motion through muscle-group and joint-segment abstractions; yet, most existing counterfactual methods operate at the channel level, producing scattered and biomechanically incoherent explanations. We propose a two-stage framework for group-based counterfactual generation in high-dimensional IMU data. We first show that Shapley-Adaptive (SA) group ranking preserves counterfactual validity but fails to enforce group-level sparsity, motivating the need for explicit group selection. We then introduce Learnable Gate (LG) methods, which incorporate trainable per-group relevance gates jointly optimized with perturbation masks. Experiments on the KneE-PAD rehabilitation dataset demonstrate that LG substantially improves modality-group sparsity compared to the channel-level M-CELS baseline while maintaining or improving validity, temporal smoothness, and generation efficiency. Exercise-specific analyses further show that group-structured counterfactuals yield concise, muscle-level corrective guidance aligned with clinical reasoning. Overall, the proposed framework enhances interpretability without sacrificing counterfactual quality, enabling more actionable explanations for rehabilitation movement analysis.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2026.
Builds on
18 of 37 references.
References · 18
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
- 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
- 2016Time Series Classification from Scratch with Deep Neural Networks: A Strong Baselinecited by 358
- 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 341
- 2020Algorithmic Recourse: from Counterfactual Explanations to Interventionscited by 250
- 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2019Learning Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Tabular Datacited by 146
- 2019Preserving Causal Constraints in Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Classifierscited by 143
- 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 116
6 more
- 2020Instance-based Counterfactual Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 64
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning on Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 49
- 2021Conditional Generative Models for Counterfactual Explanationscited by 28
- 2024M-CELS: Counterfactual Explanation for Multivariate Time Series Data Guided by Learned Saliency Mapscited by 10
- 2024Shapelet-based Model-agnostic Counterfactual Local Explanations for Time Series Classificationcited by 6
- 2025Data-Driven Discovery of Feature Groups in Clinical Time Seriescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.