FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Robot policies inevitably encounter failures when deployed in real environments. Naive retries often repeat the same mistakes, while many existing recovery methods rely on human intervention. In this paper, we propose Failure-Aware Retry (FAR), a framework that enables robots to learn from previous failures at test time, adapt their behavior accordingly, and eventually complete the task autonomously. FAR combines Failure-Contrastive Preference Adaptation, which constructs preference learning data from failures to steer the policy away from previously unsuccessful behaviors, with lightweight action perturbations during retries to encourage local exploration. We further incorporate successful recovery trajectories into a training loop for continual policy improvement. Experiments in both simulation and real-world manipulation tasks show that FAR substantially improves success rates and robustness, with average gains of 17.6% over the standard diffusion policy in simulation and 11.7% in the real world. In addition, FAR improves data efficiency under both reset and timestep budgets during continual policy improvement by exploiting informative failure cases. Videos and code are available at https://hoar012.github.io/FAR-Project.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 87 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
87 of 96 references.
References · 87
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
- 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
- 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
- 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
- 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
38 more
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
- 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 767
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
- 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
- 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
- 2020Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulationcited by 342
- 2023Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 332
- 2017Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperationcited by 286
- 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 280
- 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
- 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 255
- 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
- 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuningcited by 230
- 2024ManiSkill3: GPU Parallelized Robotics Simulation and Rendering for Generalizable Embodied AIcited by 216
- 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 211
- 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 171
- 2025Flow Q-Learningcited by 162
- 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 157
- 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
- 2024Precise and Dexterous Robotic Manipulation via Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 153
- 2019Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Functioncited by 141
- 2025SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learningcited by 141
- 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 118
- 2025Improving Vision-Language-Action Model with Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 107
- 2019Self-Supervised Correspondence in Visuomotor Policy Learningcited by 106
- 2023Policy Expansion for Bridging Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 103
- 2025What Can RL Bring to VLA Generalization? An Empirical Studycited by 102
- 2017Vision-Based Multi-Task Manipulation for Inexpensive Robots Using End-To-End Learning from Demonstrationcited by 100
- 2024Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidancecited by 100
- 2020C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive Classificationcited by 99
- 2021ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learningcited by 98
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
- 2021Reset-Free Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Task Learning: Learning Dexterous Manipulation Behaviors without Human Interventioncited by 90
50 most cited of 87 All 87 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Hierarchical Skill Retrieval for Data-Efficient Adaptation of Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 0
- 2026CARF: Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-Guided Flow Matchingcited by 0
- 2026Spotter: Let the Embodied Model Lead, and the VLM Reflect for Itcited by 0
- 2026FoldBack: Self-Correcting Masked Generative Policy for Long-Horizon Garment Foldingcited by 0
- 2026FoldBack: Self-Correcting Masked Generative Policy for Long-Horizon Garment Folding7 Oct 2026
- 2026Spotter: Let the Embodied Model Lead, and the VLM Reflect for It29 Sep 2026
- 2026CARF: Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-Guided Flow Matching18 Sep 2026
- 2026Hierarchical Skill Retrieval for Data-Efficient Adaptation of Vision-Language-Action Models25 Aug 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026F4R: Failure-Driven Recognition, Reconstruction, Refinement, and Redeployment for Continual Robot Self-Improvement
- 2026FIERCE: From Generalist Robot Policies to Fast Specialists via Progress-Failure Feedback ↗
- 2026Learning from Demonstration with Failure Awareness for Safe Robot Navigation
- 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progress
- 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies
- 2026Kintsugi-VLA: Turning Failed Robot Rollouts into Recovery Data through Interventional Recoverability
- 2026Retry, Switch, or Abstain? Learning Strategy-Aware Tool-Use Policies via Controlled Error Injection
- 2026Rewind-IL: Online Failure Detection and State Respawning for Imitation Learning