mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement

arXiv 2607.01111 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2026cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Robot policies inevitably encounter failures when deployed in real environments. Naive retries often repeat the same mistakes, while many existing recovery methods rely on human intervention. In this paper, we propose Failure-Aware Retry (FAR), a framework that enables robots to learn from previous failures at test time, adapt their behavior accordingly, and eventually complete the task autonomously. FAR combines Failure-Contrastive Preference Adaptation, which constructs preference learning data from failures to steer the policy away from previously unsuccessful behaviors, with lightweight action perturbations during retries to encourage local exploration. We further incorporate successful recovery trajectories into a training loop for continual policy improvement. Experiments in both simulation and real-world manipulation tasks show that FAR substantially improves success rates and robustness, with average gains of 17.6% over the standard diffusion policy in simulation and 11.7% in the real world. In addition, FAR improves data efficiency under both reset and timestep budgets during continual policy improvement by exploiting informative failure cases. Videos and code are available at https://hoar012.github.io/FAR-Project.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 87 of its 96 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.

Builds on

87 of 96 references.

References · 87

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  6. 2021Improved Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 3,736
  7. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  8. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  9. 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
  10. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  11. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  12. 2025π0.5: a Vision-Language-Action Model with Open-World Generalizationcited by 1,653
38 more
  1. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
  2. 2023Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardwarecited by 1,490
  3. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  4. 2023Diffusion Model Alignment Using Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 767
  5. 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 750
  6. 2020CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representations for Reinforcement Learningcited by 745
  7. 2021What Matters in Learning from Offline Human Demonstrations for Robot Manipulationcited by 699
  8. 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
  9. 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
  10. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Test-Time Adaptation under Distribution Shiftscited by 353
  11. 2020Transporter Networks: Rearranging the Visual World for Robotic Manipulationcited by 342
  12. 2023Efficient Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datacited by 332
  13. 2017Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperationcited by 286
  14. 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 280
  15. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 258
  16. 2024Diffusion Policy Policy Optimizationcited by 255
  17. 2022Contrastive Learning as Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learningcited by 241
  18. 2023Cal-QL: Calibrated Offline RL Pre-Training for Efficient Online Fine-Tuningcited by 230
  19. 2024ManiSkill3: GPU Parallelized Robotics Simulation and Rendering for Generalizable Embodied AIcited by 216
  20. 2021Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learning via Balanced Replay and Pessimistic Q-Ensemblecited by 211
  21. 2023REFLECT: Summarizing Robot Experiences for Failure Explanation and Correctioncited by 171
  22. 2025Flow Q-Learningcited by 162
  23. 2021Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 157
  24. 2020Recovery RL: Safe Reinforcement Learning with Learned Recovery Zonescited by 156
  25. 2024Precise and Dexterous Robotic Manipulation via Human-in-the-Loop Reinforcement Learningcited by 153
  26. 2019Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Functioncited by 141
  27. 2025SimpleVLA-RL: Scaling VLA Training via Reinforcement Learningcited by 141
  28. 2024AHA: A Vision-Language-Model for Detecting and Reasoning Over Failures in Robotic Manipulationcited by 118
  29. 2025Improving Vision-Language-Action Model with Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 107
  30. 2019Self-Supervised Correspondence in Visuomotor Policy Learningcited by 106
  31. 2023Policy Expansion for Bridging Offline-to-Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 103
  32. 2025What Can RL Bring to VLA Generalization? An Empirical Studycited by 102
  33. 2017Vision-Based Multi-Task Manipulation for Inexpensive Robots Using End-To-End Learning from Demonstrationcited by 100
  34. 2024Steering Your Generalists: Improving Robotic Foundation Models via Value Guidancecited by 100
  35. 2020C-Learning: Learning to Achieve Goals via Recursive Classificationcited by 99
  36. 2021ThriftyDAgger: Budget-Aware Novelty and Risk Gating for Interactive Imitation Learningcited by 98
  37. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Action Chunkingcited by 97
  38. 2021Reset-Free Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Task Learning: Learning Dexterous Manipulation Behaviors without Human Interventioncited by 90

50 most cited of 87 All 87 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026F4R: Failure-Driven Recognition, Reconstruction, Refinement, and Redeployment for Continual Robot Self-Improvement
  2. 2026FIERCE: From Generalist Robot Policies to Fast Specialists via Progress-Failure Feedback ↗
  3. 2026Learning from Demonstration with Failure Awareness for Safe Robot Navigation
  4. 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progress
  5. 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies
  6. 2026Kintsugi-VLA: Turning Failed Robot Rollouts into Recovery Data through Interventional Recoverability
  7. 2026Retry, Switch, or Abstain? Learning Strategy-Aware Tool-Use Policies via Controlled Error Injection
  8. 2026Rewind-IL: Online Failure Detection and State Respawning for Imitation Learning