Aionoscope: Debugging Latent-State Accessibility in Time-Series Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Time-series models are often evaluated by what they can forecast or classify, but those scores do not show whether their representations preserve the process state a user may want to inspect: event timing, phase, amplitude, frequency, or regime variables. We introduce Aionoscope, a generator-based diagnostic tool for debugging latent-state accessibility in frozen time-series representations. Aionoscope separates process generation from observation rendering, producing seeded synthetic streams with exact categorical and dense labels across mixture complexity and nuisance variation. We instantiate Aionoscope as Primitive Process Mixtures and evaluate 37 model-plus-adapter systems with a common pooled linear-probe protocol. The main result is a mismatch between coarse and fine-grained accessibility. Most systems make component presence easy to recover, but expose dense process state much less reliably: the highest observed dense-probe row reaches 0.689 mean masked R2, while a dense-feature oracle reaches 0.999. This is the failure mode Aionoscope is designed to surface: a representation can look informative at the level of "what kind of signal is present" while hiding the timing, phase, amplitude, frequency, or regime variables needed for debugging.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2026.
Builds on
17 of 20 references.
References · 17
- 2016Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probescited by 1,353
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2024Chronos: Learning the Language of Time Seriescited by 759
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2021TS2Vec: Towards Universal Representation of Time Seriescited by 471
- 2021Time-Series Representation Learning via Temporal and Contextual Contrastingcited by 345
- 2021Unsupervised Representation Learning for Time Series with Temporal Neighborhood Codingcited by 224
- 2024GIFT-Eval: A Benchmark For General Time Series Forecasting Model Evaluationcited by 212
- 2024Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Informationcited by 87
- 2023ECG-QA: A Comprehensive Question Answering Dataset Combined With Electrocardiogramcited by 54
- 2025Rethinking Evaluation in the Era of Time Series Foundation Models: (Un)known Information Leakage Challengescited by 16
- 2025CauKer: Classification Time Series Foundation Models Can Be Pretrained on Synthetic Datacited by 13
5 more
- 2025Pre-trained Forecasting Models: Strong Zero-Shot Feature Extractors for Time Series Classificationcited by 9
- 2021Learning Disentangled Representations for Time Seriescited by 8
- 2024Are Synthetic Time-series Data Really not as Good as Real Data?cited by 7
- 2025How Foundational are Foundation Models for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 5
- 2025Frequency Matters: When Time Series Foundation Models Fail Under Spectral Shiftcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.