mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Are Synthetic Time-series Data Really not as Good as Real Data?

arXiv 2402.00607 ↗First posted 1 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Time-series data presents limitations stemming from data quality issues, bias and vulnerabilities, and generalization problem. Integrating universal data synthesis methods holds promise in improving generalization. However, current methods cannot guarantee that the generator's output covers all unseen real data. In this paper, we introduce InfoBoost -- a highly versatile cross-domain data synthesizing framework with time series representation learning capability. We have developed a method based on synthetic data that enables model training without the need for real data, surpassing the performance of models trained with real data. Additionally, we have trained a universal feature extractor based on our synthetic data that is applicable to all time-series data. Our approach overcomes interference from multiple sources rhythmic signal, noise interference, and long-period features that exceed sampling window capabilities. Through experiments, our non-deep-learning synthetic data enables models to achieve superior reconstruction performance and universal explicit representation extraction without the need for real data.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformerscited by 1,981
  2. 2020A Transformer-based Framework for Multivariate Time Series Representation Learningcited by 449
  3. 2021A Hitchhiker's Guide to Structural Similaritycited by 16
  4. 2023Traffic Prediction using Artificial Intelligence: Review of Recent Advances and Emerging Opportunitiescited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

7 papers.