Adaptive Perturbation Selection for Contrastive Audio Decoding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large audio-language models (LALMs) frequently hallucinate by overriding acoustic evidence with language priors. While contrastive decoding (CD) offers training-free mitigation, existing methods rely on blunt perturbations like masking or noise, leaving structured audio transformations unexplored. We explore this design space by evaluating a diverse library of targeted audio perturbations and adaptively selecting the optimal negative branch for each task and example. First, we improve upon earlier prompt engineering by showing that a simple binary yes/no constraint reduces the model's tendency to falsely confirm absent audio features. Second, evaluating our library across temporal, spectral, frequency, and amplitude domains reveals that optimal transformations are highly task-dependent; for instance, reversing the audio array disrupts temporal coherence, raising accuracy on the temporal order task from 74.7% to 81.4%. Finally, we trained a light-weight perturbation selector on model hidden states to dynamically route negative branches, yielding an additional +4.3% gain on the existence task.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2026.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 671
- 2022Contrastive Decoding: Open-ended Text Generation as Optimizationcited by 598
- 2024Qwen2-Audio Technical Reportcited by 543
- 2023SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language Modelscited by 492
- 2023DoLa: Decoding by Contrasting Layers Improves Factuality in Large Language Modelscited by 367
- 2023Pengi: An Audio Language Model for Audio Taskscited by 217
- 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Modelscited by 210
- 2023Listen, Think, and Understandcited by 206
- 2024WavLLM: Towards Robust and Adaptive Speech Large Language Modelcited by 107
- 2024mDPO: Conditional Preference Optimization for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 92
- 2022Clotho-AQA: A Crowdsourced Dataset for Audio Question Answeringcited by 84
11 more
- 2024AVHBench: A Cross-Modal Hallucination Benchmark for Audio-Visual Large Language Modelscited by 50
- 2025DeSTA2.5-Audio: Toward General-Purpose Large Audio Language Model with Self-Generated Cross-Modal Alignmentcited by 47
- 2023CompA: Addressing the Gap in Compositional Reasoning in Audio-Language Modelscited by 43
- 2024Understanding Sounds, Missing the Questions: The Challenge of Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 30
- 2024Can Large Audio-Language Models Truly Hear? Tackling Hallucinations with Multi-Task Assessment and Stepwise Audio Reasoningcited by 29
- 2025AVCD: Mitigating Hallucinations in Audio-Visual Large Language Models through Contrastive Decodingcited by 26
- 2025SALMONN-omni: A Standalone Speech LLM without Codec Injection for Full-duplex Conversationcited by 25
- 2025Reducing Object Hallucination in Large Audio-Language Models via Audio-Aware Decodingcited by 22
- 2026HalluAudio: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Hallucination Detection in Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 7
- 2026How Contrastive Decoding Enhances Large Audio Language Modelscited by 5
- 2026Temporal Contrastive Decoding: A Training-Free Method for Large Audio-Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.