Optimizer Memory Makes Shuffle Order a First-Order Source of Fine-Tuning Noise
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Shuffle order can be a larger source of fine-tuning noise than a memoryless analysis predicts: fixed-clock optimizer memory makes local equal-multiset contrasts first order in the learning rate rather than second order, and the resulting order channel can be large enough for a single seed to flip a close A/B comparison. We isolate this mechanism and derive a fit-free way to size the noise it produces. For a memoryless optimizer, reordering an equal multiset has no first-order endpoint term; the leading local contrast is the O(η2) gradient bracket. Fixed-clock optimizers such as AdamW are different. Their moment buffers, preconditioner state, and de-biasing counters advance with the step index rather than with the learning-rate-scaled time τ=η k, so the same gradient can receive a position-dependent endpoint weight. For any fixed finite measurement window, a lifted-state expansion gives an O(η) equal-multiset contrast whenever the first-order replay coefficient is nonzero, while regular and clock-matched controls remain O(η2); a bare fixed-β momentum buffer is already enough. A bitwise-deterministic replay from one warmed optimizer state isolates the mechanism, giving order-variance slopes 1.83 for AdamW, 2.00 for fixed-β momentum, and 4.00 for SGD; matching the memory clock to τ restores the regular exponent. For AdamW with a frozen preconditioner, the same impulse-weight kernel gives a closed-form asymptotic order-variance floor after the local potentials are measured, with no fitted coefficients. The result is local to the measurement window (independent reshuffling can average the channel across windows), but it yields order-noise error bars, positional attribution weights, and a seed-budget criterion for fine-tuning comparisons.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 52 references.
References · 39
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,195
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
- 2024Gemma 2: Improving Open Language Models at a Practical Sizecited by 1,928
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 896
- 2019On the Convergence of Adam and Beyondcited by 834
- 2023Symbolic Discovery of Optimization Algorithmscited by 423
- 2018Shampoo: Preconditioned Stochastic Tensor Optimizationcited by 413
27 more
- 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 377
- 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent as Approximate Bayesian Inferencecited by 298
- 2021Curriculum Learning: A Surveycited by 257
- 2017Automated Curriculum Learning for Neural Networkscited by 251
- 2021On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 183
- 2015Stochastic modified equations and adaptive stochastic gradient algorithmscited by 141
- 2022A Kernel-Based View of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 118
- 2022On the SDEs and Scaling Rules for Adaptive Gradient Algorithmscited by 100
- 2015Why Random Reshuffling Beats Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 78
- 2021Manipulating SGD with Data Ordering Attackscited by 73
- 2018Random Shuffling Beats SGD after Finite Epochscited by 66
- 2020SGD with shuffling: optimal rates without component convexity and large epoch requirementscited by 57
- 2020Closing the convergence gap of SGD without replacementcited by 56
- 2023On the Implicit Bias of Adamcited by 25
- 2022GraB: Finding Provably Better Data Permutations than Random Reshufflingcited by 18
- 2023On the Trajectories of SGD Without Replacementcited by 10
- 2025Commute Your Domains: Trajectory Optimality Criterion for Multi-Domain Learningcited by 9
- 2026The Geometry of Sequential Learning: Lie-Bracket Prediction of Transfer Ordercited by 8
- 2025How Memory in Optimization Algorithms Implicitly Modifies the Losscited by 6
- 2025Fresh in memory: Training-order recency is linearly encoded in language model activationscited by 5
- 2023Implicit biases in multitask and continual learning from a backward error analysis perspectivecited by 4
- 2024Does the Order of Fine-tuning Matter and Why?cited by 4
- 2025Adam Reduces a Unique Form of Sharpness: Theoretical Insights Near the Minimizer Manifoldcited by 4
- 2025Randomised Splitting Methods and Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 3
- 2026Process-Tensor Tomography of SGD: Measuring Non-Markovian Memory via Back-Flow of Distinguishabilitycited by 2
- 2022Computing the Variance of Shuffling Stochastic Gradient Algorithms via Power Spectral Density Analysiscited by 1
- 2026The Order Is The Messagecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformerscited by 3
- 2026Fiber Fingerprints of Hidden Learning-State Dynamicscited by 2
- 2026Finite-Horizon Input-Output Dynamics of Minibatch Perturbations in AdamWcited by 1
- 2026Stored in Optimizer State, Valued by Later Training: A Causal Account of Subliminal Trait Transfercited by 1
- 2026The Free-Recipe Limit: Every Recipe Effect Measures Which Premise of an Idealised Learner Brokecited by 0
- 2026Commutator Memory: Sparse, Path-Local Reading and Steering in Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Commutator Memory: Sparse, Path-Local Reading and Steering in Language Models28 Sep 2026
- 2026Stored in Optimizer State, Valued by Later Training: A Causal Account of Subliminal Trait Transfer20 Aug 2026
- 2026Finite-Horizon Input-Output Dynamics of Minibatch Perturbations in AdamW20 Aug 2026
- 2026Fiber Fingerprints of Hidden Learning-State Dynamics17 Aug 2026
- 2026The Free-Recipe Limit: Every Recipe Effect Measures Which Premise of an Idealised Learner Broke9 Aug 2026
- 2026First-Order Predictable but Pairwise Fragile: Local Task Adaptation in Trained Transformers18 Jul 2026