mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fresh in memory: Training-order recency is linearly encoded in language model activations

arXiv 2509.14223 ↗First posted 17 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that language models' activations linearly encode when information was learned during training. Our setup involves creating a model with a known training order by sequentially fine-tuning Llama-3.2-1B on six disjoint but otherwise similar datasets about named entities. We find that the average activations of test samples corresponding to the six training datasets encode the training order: when projected into a 2D subspace, these centroids are arranged exactly in the order of training and lie on a straight line. Further, we show that linear probes can accurately (~90%) distinguish "early" vs. "late" entities, generalizing to entities unseen during the probes' own training. The model can also be fine-tuned to explicitly report an unseen entity's training stage (~80% accuracy). Interestingly, the training-order encoding does not seem attributable to simple differences in activation magnitudes, losses, or model confidence. Our paper demonstrates that models are capable of differentiating information by its acquisition time, and carries significant implications for how they might manage conflicting data and respond to knowledge modifications.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 19 references.

References · 15

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  3. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  4. 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
  5. 2018Adafactor: Adaptive Learning Rates with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 905
  6. 2024Alignment faking in large language modelscited by 360
  7. 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 115
  8. 2022Probing Representation Forgetting in Supervised and Unsupervised Continual Learningcited by 76
  9. 2021Manipulating SGD with Data Ordering Attackscited by 74
  10. 2022Fortuitous Forgetting in Connectionist Networkscited by 39
  11. 2024Learned feature representations are biased by complexity, learning order, position, and morecited by 23
  12. 2025On Linear Representations and Pretraining Data Frequency in Language Modelscited by 23
3 more
  1. 2024Extractive Structures Learned in Pretraining Enable Generalization on Finetuned Factscited by 14
  2. 2023Implicit meta-learning may lead language models to trust more reliable sourcescited by 10
  3. 2024Reawakening knowledge: Anticipatory recovery from catastrophic interference via structured trainingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Learning to Read Out: Unembedding Dynamics in Language Model Pretraining
  2. 2024Learning and Unlearning of Fabricated Knowledge in Language Models
  3. 2026What do Language Models Learn and When? The Implicit Curriculum Hypothesis
  4. 2025Identifying and Mitigating the Influence of the Prior Distribution in Large Language Models
  5. 2026MechaTerp-TRACE: A Novel Approach for Component Ablation Analysis in Language Models
  6. 2024Just read twice: closing the recall gap for recurrent language models
  7. 2026Language Models Generalize to Human-like Word Order Preferences
  8. 2026The Alignment Paradox: How Post-Training Amplifies Confident Hallucinations in Language Models