SHIFT: Gate-Modulated Activation Steering for Knowledge Conflict Mitigation in Retrieval-Augmented Generation
On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances the faithfulness of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge into the generation process. However, conflicts between retrieved context and parametric knowledge can cause LLMs to rely on inconsistent internal knowledge, hindering their ability to faithfully leverage retrieved evidence. Existing approaches mitigate this issue by editing parametric knowledge to resolve such conflicts. However, locating and modifying knowledge encoded in model parameters is challenging and may inadvertently compromise the backbone LLM's capabilities. In this paper, we introduce SPARK, a novel framework that formulates parametric knowledge control as a latent participation policy learning problem, enabling LLMs to adaptively regulate the contribution of parametric knowledge during generation. Specifically, SPARK introduces a lightweight participation policy that dynamically modulates the contribution of FFN-mediated parametric knowledge while keeping the backbone LLM frozen. The participation policy is optimized with a faithfulness-oriented reward, enabling fine-grained control over parametric knowledge participation during generation. Extensive experiments on six datasets validate the effectiveness of SPARK, which introduces and optimizes only 0.01% additional trainable parameters while keeping the backbone LLM fully frozen, thereby preserving its general capabilities and achieving more faithful generation than competitive baselines. All datasets and code are available at https://github.com/OpenBMB/SHIFT.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 51 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2026.
Builds on
51 of 61 references.
Closest ancestors · 4
Same direction, newest first
- 2025Resisting Contextual Interference in RAG via Parametric-Knowledge Reinforcement5 Jun
- 2025Parameters vs. Context: Fine-Grained Control of Knowledge Reliance in Language Models20 Mar
- 2025Improving Contextual Faithfulness of Large Language Models via Retrieval Heads-Induced Optimization23 Jan
- 2024CtrlA: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Inherent Control29 May
Other references · 47
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,141
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,210
- 2022When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memoriescited by 1,128
35 more
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 952
- 2020Aligning AI With Shared Human Valuescited by 723
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 719
- 2023In-Context Retrieval-Augmented Language Modelscited by 702
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 639
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
- 2025ToolRL: Reward is All Tool Learning Needscited by 362
- 2021Entity-Based Knowledge Conflicts in Question Answeringcited by 356
- 2023Adaptive Chameleon or Stubborn Sloth: Revealing the Behavior of Large Language Models in Knowledge Conflictscited by 341
- 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 331
- 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
- 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
- 2023Does Localization Inform Editing? Surprising Differences in Causality-Based Localization vs. Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 243
- 2023Evaluating the Ripple Effects of Knowledge Editing in Language Modelscited by 242
- 2017SearchQA: A New Q&A Dataset Augmented with Context from a Search Enginecited by 225
- 2023RA-DIT: Retrieval-Augmented Dual Instruction Tuningcited by 195
- 2019MRQA 2019 Shared Task: Evaluating Generalization in Reading Comprehensioncited by 184
- 2024FlashRAG: A Modular Toolkit for Efficient Retrieval-Augmented Generation Researchcited by 166
- 2022Rich Knowledge Sources Bring Complex Knowledge Conflicts: Recalibrating Models to Reflect Conflicting Evidencecited by 144
- 2024Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescuecited by 103
- 2024ReDeEP: Detecting Hallucination in Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 101
- 2024Cutting Off the Head Ends the Conflict: A Mechanism for Interpreting and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Language Modelscited by 91
- 2024From Matching to Generation: A Survey on Generative Information Retrievalcited by 89
- 2023Detecting Edit Failures In Large Language Models: An Improved Specificity Benchmarkcited by 62
- 2023Journey to the Center of the Knowledge Neurons: Discoveries of Language-Independent Knowledge Neurons and Degenerate Knowledge Neuronscited by 56
- 2024Context-DPO: Aligning Language Models for Context-Faithfulnesscited by 50
- 2024What does the Knowledge Neuron Thesis Have to do with Knowledge?cited by 49
- 2024MAIN-RAG: Multi-Agent Filtering Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 44
- 2024IRCAN: Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in LLM Generation via Identifying and Reweighting Context-Aware Neuronscited by 38
- 2024AdaCAD: Adaptively Decoding to Balance Conflicts between Contextual and Parametric Knowledgecited by 37
- 2024RAG-DDR: Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Differentiable Data Rewardscited by 33
- 2023Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Self-Consistency of Code Large Language Models with IdentityChaincited by 31
- 2025Taming Knowledge Conflicts in Language Modelscited by 30
- 2024Should We Really Edit Language Models? On the Evaluation of Edited Language Modelscited by 18
- 2025Continuously Steering LLMs Sensitivity to Contextual Knowledge with Proxy Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Unveiling Knowledge Utilization Mechanisms in LLM-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025Beyond Black-Box Interventions: Latent Probing for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2025NeuroGenPoisoning: Neuron-Guided Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation of LLM via Genetic Optimization of External Knowledge
- 2026Query-Adaptive Neuron Steering for LLMs
- 2025Conflict-Aware Soft Prompting for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- 2026Where Does Robustness Live? Neuron-Guided Adaptation for Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
- 2026TokenMem: Faithful Knowledge Injection for Frozen LLMs
- 2025Systematic Knowledge Injection into Large Language Models via Diverse Augmentation for Domain-Specific RAG