mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Systematic Knowledge Injection into Large Language Models via Diverse Augmentation for Domain-Specific RAG

arXiv 2502.08356 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2025cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a prominent method for incorporating domain knowledge into Large Language Models (LLMs). While RAG enhances response relevance by incorporating retrieved domain knowledge in the context, retrieval errors can still lead to hallucinations and incorrect answers. To recover from retriever failures, domain knowledge is injected by fine-tuning the model to generate the correct response, even in the case of retrieval errors. However, we observe that without systematic knowledge augmentation, fine-tuned LLMs may memorize new information but still fail to extract relevant domain knowledge, leading to poor performance. In this work, we present a novel framework that significantly enhances the fine-tuning process by augmenting the training data in two ways -- context augmentation and knowledge paraphrasing. In context augmentation, we create multiple training samples for a given QA pair by varying the relevance of the retrieved information, teaching the model when to ignore and when to rely on retrieved content. In knowledge paraphrasing, we fine-tune with multiple answers to the same question, enabling LLMs to better internalize specialized knowledge. To mitigate catastrophic forgetting due to fine-tuning, we add a domain-specific identifier to a question and also utilize a replay buffer containing general QA pairs. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of our method over existing techniques, achieving up to 10% relative gain in token-level recall while preserving the LLM's generalization capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 30 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2025.

Builds on

30 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024RA-ISF: Learning to Answer and Understand from Retrieval Augmentation via Iterative Self-Feedback11 Mar
  2. 2024Tug-of-War Between Knowledge: Exploring and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models22 Feb
  3. 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection17 Oct
  4. 2021End-to-End Training of Multi-Document Reader and Retriever for Open-Domain Question Answering9 Jun

Other references · 26

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  3. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  4. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  5. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  6. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  7. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
  8. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  9. 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
  10. 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
  11. 2023REPLUG: Retrieval-Augmented Black-Box Language Modelscited by 786
  12. 2023Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Contextcited by 364
14 more
  1. 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
  2. 2024RAFT: Adapting Language Model to Domain Specific RAGcited by 258
  3. 2023Continual Pre-training of Language Modelscited by 194
  4. 2019Episodic Memory in Lifelong Language Learningcited by 188
  5. 2021Towards Continual Knowledge Learning of Language Modelscited by 172
  6. 2022Fine-tuned Language Models are Continual Learnerscited by 152
  7. 2023Evaluating Correctness and Faithfulness of Instruction-Following Models for Question Answeringcited by 150
  8. 2024Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models with Self-Synthesized Rehearsalcited by 114
  9. 2024SuRe: Summarizing Retrievals using Answer Candidates for Open-domain QA of LLMscited by 67
  10. 2023InstructRetro: Instruction Tuning post Retrieval-Augmented Pretrainingcited by 53
  11. 2024Improving Retrieval for RAG based Question Answering Models on Financial Documentscited by 48
  12. 2024LAB: Large-Scale Alignment for ChatBotscited by 39
  13. 2024Self-Tuning: Instructing LLMs to Effectively Acquire New Knowledge through Self-Teachingcited by 17
  14. 2023Pointwise Mutual Information Based Metric and Decoding Strategy for Faithful Generation in Document Grounded Dialogscited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMs
  2. 2025Parametric Retrieval Augmented Generation
  3. 2024Fine Tuning vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation for Less Popular Knowledge
  4. 2024Long-Context LLMs Meet RAG: Overcoming Challenges for Long Inputs in RAG
  5. 2025Post-training an LLM for RAG? Train on Self-Generated Demonstrations
  6. 2025Injecting External Knowledge into the Reasoning Process Enhances Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  7. 2024Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models
  8. 2025Comparing Knowledge Injection Methods for LLMs in a Low-Resource Regime