mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining Temporal Graph Neural Networks via Feature-induced Information Flow

arXiv 2606.27201 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Event-based Temporal Graph Neural Networks (ETGNNs) have demonstrated strong performance across a wide range of applications, including social network analysis, epidemic tracing, recommender systems, and political event forecasting. However, their increasing complexity poses significant challenges for explainability. Existing explanation methods focus only on a subset of the information flow within ETGNNs, typically tracing contributions from the event-related embeddings to the output. Consequently, they overlook the important pathways through event-induced variables, which mediate interactions between nodes and thereby play a central role in capturing long-range temporal dependencies. To overcome this limitation, we propose a novel attribution method that analyzes the entire information flow through all event-associated variables. Our method is built upon the recent Normalized Relevance Measure (NRM) framework, which enables explicit quantification of information flow originating from event embeddings as well as information flow passing through event-induced variables. It also ensures comparability of latent variables across layers, and supports higher-order analysis of interactions between events. To handle the architectural complexity of ETGNNs, we extend the NRM framework with a modular decomposition procedure that facilitates the systematic construction of relevance structure for complex neural architectures. We evaluate our approach on two synthetic datasets for epidemic tracing and social dynamics, as well as a real-world dataset of political event networks. Our qualitative and quantitative experiments show that our method consistently outperforms existing explanation approaches while producing more human-interpretable explanations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

29 of 53 references.

References · 29

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  3. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
  4. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  6. 2018FastGCN: Fast Learning with Graph Convolutional Networks via Importance Samplingcited by 583
  7. 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
  8. 2016Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model CNNscited by 468
  9. 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 454
  10. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  11. 2015Evaluating the visualization of what a Deep Neural Network has learnedcited by 416
  12. 2018T-GCN: A Temporal Graph ConvolutionalNetwork for Traffic Predictioncited by 399
17 more
  1. 2020Explainability in Graph Neural Networks: A Taxonomic Surveycited by 383
  2. 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
  3. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 248
  4. 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
  5. 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 116
  6. 2022XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative Propagationcited by 100
  7. 2018Streaming Graph Neural Networkscited by 91
  8. 2017Explaining Recurrent Neural Network Predictions in Sentiment Analysiscited by 87
  9. 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Deep Graph Representation Learningcited by 72
  10. 2016"What is Relevant in a Text Document?": An Interpretable Machine Learning Approachcited by 53
  11. 2022Beyond Explaining: Opportunities and Challenges of XAI-Based Model Improvementcited by 48
  12. 2023TempME: Towards the Explainability of Temporal Graph Neural Networks via Motif Discoverycited by 27
  13. 2024The Clever Hans Effect in Unsupervised Learningcited by 24
  14. 2019Explaining and Interpreting LSTMscited by 23
  15. 2021PredDiff: Explanations and Interactions from Conditional Expectationscited by 16
  16. 2025Mitigating Clever Hans Strategies in Image Classifiers through Generating Counterexamplescited by 6
  17. 2026Normalized Relevance Measure as a Unifying Framework to Explain Neural Network Latent Structurescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.