Normalized Relevance Measure as a Unifying Framework to Explain Neural Network Latent Structures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To understand how a neural network (NN) functions and makes predictions, it has become increasingly clear that analyzing only the input domain is insufficient -- one must also examine its internal inference mechanisms to capture the complete picture. To explain the internal inference mechanisms of such models, it is essential to analyze the importance of latent representations for a given task. In this paper, we propose the normalized relevance measure (NRM) framework -- a novel general explanation procedure that attributes relevance to arbitrary sets of neurons across layers of arbitrary architectures. In the NRM framework, relevance of selected neurons is explicitly defined as a normalized signed measure, constructed using simple operations -- marginalization and conditioning based on additive and multiplicative laws -- in analogy to the probability measures. The normalization property further guarantees comparability across layers. The NRM framework subsumes existing propagation-based explanation algorithms by explicitly identifying the underlying quantity being computed. We demonstrate the utility of the framework in computer vision applications, where joint relevance analysis across multiple layers reveals key information flows in VGG16 networks. Overall, the NRM framework provides a general, mathematically grounded approach to understanding how modern NNs propagate information, offering a versatile and broadly applicable foundation for explainable artificial intelligence.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 45 references.
References · 25
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2019GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 737
- 2023Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 724
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 365
- 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 345
- 2021On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorationscited by 281
- 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 250
- 2022From Attribution Maps to Human-Understandable Explanations through Concept Relevance Propagationcited by 141
- 2020Higher-Order Explanations of Graph Neural Networks via Relevant Walkscited by 138
- 2024AttnLRP: Attention-Aware Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation for Transformerscited by 120
13 more
- 2024A Practical Review of Mechanistic Interpretability for Transformer-Based Language Modelscited by 118
- 2020Explaining Explanations: Axiomatic Feature Interactions for Deep Networkscited by 103
- 2020Neuron Shapley: Discovering the Responsible Neuronscited by 98
- 2017Detecting Statistical Interactions from Neural Network Weightscited by 80
- 2018How Important Is a Neuron?cited by 73
- 2019From Clustering to Cluster Explanations via Neural Networkscited by 34
- 2020Building and Interpreting Deep Similarity Modelscited by 34
- 2022Disentangled Explanations of Neural Network Predictions by Finding Relevant Subspacescited by 25
- 2024The Clever Hans Effect in Unsupervised Learningcited by 24
- 2019Explaining and Interpreting LSTMscited by 23
- 2024Explaining Predictive Uncertainty by Exposing Second-Order Effectscited by 10
- 2024Towards Symbolic XAI -- Explanation Through Human Understandable Logical Relationships Between Featurescited by 7
- 2026Relevant Walk Search for Explaining Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.