Cross-Head Attention Uplift Network with Inverse Propensity Score under Unobserved Confounding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uplift modeling, crucial for estimating individual treatment effects (ITE), faces dual challenges: flexibly leveraging inter-group similarity to enhance discriminative power and debiasing under unobserved confounding scenarios. In this paper, we propose the Cross-Head Attention Uplift Network (CHAUN) and Robust Adversarial Inverse Propensity Score (RA-IPS) method to address these limitations. CHAUN employs shared feature embeddings and cross-head attention mechanisms to dynamically integrate treatment-specific and control-specific representations, enhancing inter-group correlation modeling. Theoretically, we prove that access to the true propensity scores ensures ITE identifiability even with unobserved confounders. For practical scenarios lacking true propensity scores, RA-IPS adversarially optimizes propensity weights within constrained uncertainty sets to mitigate bias from unobserved variables. Experiments on public datasets (CRITEO-UPLIFT, LAZADA) and a production e-commerce dataset demonstrate CHAUN's superiority over state-of-the-art uplift models, achieving relative improvements of up to 25.6% in QINI scores. RA-IPS further enhances robustness, outperforming standard IPS by 5.4% under unobserved confounding. The results validate the effectiveness of our proposed methods in real-world causal inference tasks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
15 of 42 references.
References · 15
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017Meta-learners for Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Machine Learningcited by 478
- 2017Causal Effect Inference with Deep Latent-Variable Modelscited by 410
- 2019Adapting Neural Networks for the Estimation of Treatment Effectscited by 287
- 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 248
- 2018Entire Space Multi-Task Model: An Effective Approach for Estimating Post-Click Conversion Ratecited by 173
- 2016Identifying Causal Effects With Proxy Variables of an Unmeasured Confoundercited by 139
- 2020An Introduction to Proximal Causal Learningcited by 95
- 2021On Inductive Biases for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimationcited by 75
- 2018Removing Hidden Confounding by Experimental Groundingcited by 64
- 2020Causal inference methods for combining randomized trials and observational studies: a reviewcited by 51
3 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.