mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MinGram: A Minimalist Unigram Tokenizer with High Compression and Competitive Morphological Alignment

arXiv 2606.27019 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Unigram tokenizer uses an elegant representation which makes it straightforward to edit vocabularies, but its training is comparatively heavy and complex. We introduce MinGram (Minimalist Unigram), which keeps the token-list representation but simplifies training using a BPE-derived seed vocabulary, Hard EM on a minimum-token path, and a single flat score-pruning step. This removes the suffix array, the forward-backward pass, and the iterative prune loop, leaving a procedure that requires little beyond tokenizer inference itself. By making token count the primary objective and using a Unigram score only as a tiebreak, MinGram keeps the compression of pure token-count methods while retaining much of the morphological alignment and downstream quality of probabilistic ones. Across six languages, MinGram compresses better than both BPE and standard Unigram, and a compression-oriented variant matches the strongest token-count compressors while retaining substantially higher morphological alignment. In controlled downstream language-model training, Unigram-family tokenizers, with MinGram among the best, consistently beat BPE in bits-per-byte.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  2. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  3. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  4. 2020Byte Pair Encoding is Suboptimal for Language Model Pretrainingcited by 192
  5. 2024Tokenization Is More Than Compressioncited by 89
  6. 2025Nemotron-CLIMB: CLustering-based Iterative Data Mixture Bootstrapping for Language Model Pre-trainingcited by 66
  7. 2025SuperBPE: Space Travel for Language Modelscited by 63
  8. 2024Why do language models perform worse for morphologically complex languages?cited by 62
  9. 2023Tokenization and the Noiseless Channelcited by 59
  10. 2024Fishing for Magikarp: Automatically Detecting Under-trained Tokens in Large Language Modelscited by 46
  11. 2024Greed is All You Need: An Evaluation of Tokenizer Inference Methodscited by 34
  12. 2025Boundless Byte Pair Encoding: Breaking the Pre-tokenization Barriercited by 32
14 more
  1. 2024BPE Gets Picky: Efficient Vocabulary Refinement During Tokenizer Trainingcited by 31
  2. 2025MorphBPE: A Morpho-Aware Tokenizer Bridging Linguistic Complexity for Efficient LLM Training Across Morphologiescited by 25
  3. 2025Evaluating Morphological Alignment of Tokenizers in 70 Languagescited by 22
  4. 2025Parity-Aware Byte-Pair Encoding: Improving Cross-lingual Fairness in Tokenizationcited by 20
  5. 2017The University of Edinburgh's Neural MT Systems for WMT17cited by 16
  6. 2024Scaffold-BPE: Enhancing Byte Pair Encoding for Large Language Models with Simple and Effective Scaffold Token Removalcited by 16
  7. 2024Two Counterexamples to Tokenization and the Noiseless Channelcited by 13
  8. 2025BPE Stays on SCRIPT: Structured Encoding for Robust Multilingual Pretokenizationcited by 12
  9. 2022Incorporating Context into Subword Vocabulariescited by 11
  10. 2025Beyond Text Compression: Evaluating Tokenizers Across Scalescited by 11
  11. 2025Rethinking Tokenization for Rich Morphology: The Dominance of Unigram over BPE and Morphological Alignmentcited by 9
  12. 2025Which Pieces Does Unigram Tokenization Really Need?cited by 4
  13. 2026Tokenisation via Convex Relaxationscited by 4
  14. 2026Evaluating Morphological Plausibility of Subword Tokenization via Statistical Alignment with Morpho-Syntactic Featurescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.