mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Two Counterexamples to Tokenization and the Noiseless Channel

arXiv 2402.14614 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.CLcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Tokenization and the Noiseless Channel (Zouhar et al., 2023a), R'enyi efficiency is suggested as an intrinsic mechanism for evaluating a tokenizer: for NLP tasks, the tokenizer which leads to the highest R'enyi efficiency of the unigram distribution should be chosen. The R'enyi efficiency is thus treated as a predictor of downstream performance (e.g., predicting BLEU for a machine translation task), without the expensive step of training multiple models with different tokenizers. Although useful, the predictive power of this metric is not perfect, and the authors note there are additional qualities of a good tokenization scheme that R'enyi efficiency alone cannot capture. We describe two variants of BPE tokenization which can arbitrarily increase R'enyi efficiency while decreasing the downstream model performance. These counterexamples expose cases where R'enyi efficiency fails as an intrinsic tokenization metric and thus give insight for building more accurate predictors.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

6 of 15 references.

References · 6

  1. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  2. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  3. 2019BPE-Dropout: Simple and Effective Subword Regularizationcited by 195
  4. 2020Dynamic Programming Encoding for Subword Segmentation in Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  5. 2023A Formal Perspective on Byte-Pair Encodingcited by 36
  6. 2021Joint Optimization of Tokenization and Downstream Modelcited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 7.

13 papers.

Sort: