LCAi: Life Cycle Assessment with big data fusion and retrieval-augmented generation-assisted interpretation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The interpretation phase of life cycle assessment often lacks structured mechanisms for translating quantified improvement opportunities addressing environmental hotspots into actionable strategic pathways under technological, social, and policy uncertainty. To overcome this limitation, this study introduces a perspective-conditioned retrieval-augmented generation framework for LCA interpretation, where a multi-perspective retrieval and controlled synthesis is incorporated in the artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted LCA. To operationalise large language models in LCA interpretation, a perspective fusion RAG architecture was developed, covering academic, industry, public discourse, and European union (EU) funding datasets. Our approach comprises three steps: (1) a scenario anchor defining system boundaries and decarbonization targets, (2) a set of perspective-specific micro-queries with constrained retrieval, and (3) a neutral synthesis step integrating only ledger-stored outputs without further retrieval. The framework is demonstrated through a hydrogen-enabled diesel reduction use case in an Italian apple production facility using GPT-5 nano as the reasoning model. Overall, the structured retrieval and constrained synthesis are designed to mitigate the risk of hallucination while preserving cross-domain diversity. The approach presented can support more disciplined translation of impact results into strategic pathways and opens up new avenues for the use of advanced AI tools in LCA studies, particularly those focused on technologies that could be deployed at scale. This proof-of-concept demonstrates how AI-assisted, evidence-grounded interpretation can support implementation-oriented decision-making beyond conventional LCA studies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2024The Faiss librarycited by 370
- 2023The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models -- An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediationscited by 130
- 2024Data-efficient Fine-tuning for LLM-based Recommendationcited by 103
- 2024Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuningcited by 93
- 2025HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmarkcited by 88
- 2024RAG vs Fine-tuning: Pipelines, Tradeoffs, and a Case Study on Agriculturecited by 80
- 2024LLM Inference Serving: Survey of Recent Advances and Opportunitiescited by 46
- 2024Fine Tuning LLM for Enterprise: Practical Guidelines and Recommendationscited by 28
- 2025Small Language Models Offer Significant Potential for Science Communitycited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025SpiderGen: Towards Procedure Generation For Carbon Life Cycle Assessments with Generative AI
- 2024Carbon Footprint Accounting Driven by Large Language Models and Retrieval-augmented Generation
- 2025A Graph-Retrieval-Augmented Generation Framework Enhances Decision-Making in the Circular Economy
- 2025The Carbon Footprint Wizard: A Knowledge-Augmented AI Interface for Streamlining Food Carbon Footprint Analysis
- 2025CarbonChat: Large Language Model-Based Corporate Carbon Emission Analysis and Climate Knowledge Q&A System
- 2026Wasted large language models: A life cycle thinking approach
- 2025Bridging AI and Carbon Capture: A Dataset for LLMs in Ionic Liquids and CBE Research
- 2025Helios: A Foundational Language Model for Smart Energy Knowledge Reasoning and Application