mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Wasted large language models: A life cycle thinking approach

arXiv 2608.17055 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2026cs.CY cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reasoning for agents, planning and code

Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) are machine learning (ML) models that have an increasingly large carbon footprint through their development and use. Efforts to increase the energy efficiency of these models have not translated into reduced consumption due to rebound effects such as Jevons Paradox - that increased efficiency drives increased use. There is therefore a need for additional measures to solve this problem. We suggest that one possible way forward is to use life cycle thinking, and view LLMs as products that can become waste. With this perspective, we investigate the potential of the waste hierarchy from the EU's Waste Framework Directive, which suggests five different measures for how to manage waste: prevention, reuse, recycling, recovery, and disposal. We examine how these measures can inform and motivate new types of thinking and approaches to reducing LLM waste and their environmental impact in general. Applying the waste hierarchy to LLMs highlights that preventing waste is essential for reducing the models' environmental impact, mainly because it reduces the need for training new models. Prevention can be achieved through many existing methods for reusing, "recycling", and "recovering" LLMs. Additionally, disposal can be important both for saving energy and for keeping a considerate attitude to the resources being spent on training LLMs. We also call to attention that prevention of unnecessary use of LLMs carry huge potential for lowering the climate impact of the models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 12 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2026.

Builds on

12 of 44 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  2. 2025LLM Post-Training: A Deep Dive into Reasoning Large Language Modelscited by 135
  3. 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
  4. 2025How Hungry is AI? Benchmarking Energy, Water, and Carbon Footprint of LLM Inferencecited by 76
  5. 2024Towards Modular LLMs by Building and Reusing a Library of LoRAscited by 72
  6. 2024The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 64
  7. 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Bias in LLMs: Current Landscape and Future Directionscited by 27
  8. 2025Mid-Training of Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 21
  9. 2025A Survey on LLM Mid-Trainingcited by 21
  10. 2025Imposing AI: Deceptive design patterns against sustainabilitycited by 2
  11. 2025From FLOPs to Footprints: The Resource Cost of Artificial Intelligencecited by 2
  12. 2026The Shrinking Lifespan of LLMs in Sciencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Models
  2. 2025What can large language models do for sustainable food?
  3. 2025Unveiling Environmental Impacts of Large Language Model Serving: A Functional Unit View
  4. 2026Beyond Energy: When Sustainability Dimensions Reshape LLM Serving Decisions
  5. 2024Carbon Footprint Accounting Driven by Large Language Models and Retrieval-augmented Generation
  6. 2026WuYuEval: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Solid Waste Management
  7. 2025Optimizing Large Language Models: Metrics, Energy Efficiency, and Case Study Insights
  8. 2025RE-LLM: Integrating Large Language Models into Renewable Energy Systems