Socratic agents for autonomous scientific discovery in high-dimensional physical systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The automation of scientific discovery has reached an inflection point. While AI systems now operate instruments, optimize parameters and generate hypotheses, most remain procedural: they execute workflows fixed by human designers. True autonomous science demands epistemic autonomy--the capacity to construct, challenge and revise physical explanations in response to evidence. Here we introduce AHOIS, a multi-agent AI scientist that embeds Socratic midwifery into closed-loop experimentation. A physics-critic agent interrogates hypotheses through causal questioning, constraint checking, counterexample generation and falsification-criteria formulation. We evaluate AHOIS on a real multimode-fibre optical platform, a high-dimensional system with complex wave transformations, indirect detection, environmental drift and multi-modal acquisition. Without prior encoding schemes, classifiers or speckle models, the system autonomously proposed and validated a random-interference encoding hypothesis, discovered task-adaptive sparse-measurement strategies, diagnosed distinct failure modes (encoding instability, fluorescence contamination and detector noise) and translated a published imaging protocol into an executable workflow on a non-original configuration. The discovered encoding yielded 16x16 measurements with effective rank 56.9 and classification accuracies of 76.97% on MNIST and 83.17% on Fashion-MNIST. Ablations show that Socratic interrogation improves physical consistency, hypothesis completeness, uncertainty calibration and experimental-plan validity. These results establish a route from workflow automation towards evidence-grounded, self-correcting autonomous discovery in complex physical environments.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.
Builds on
39 of 62 references.
References · 39
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,182
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
- 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
- 2023Cognitive Architectures for Language Agentscited by 429
- 2025Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientistcited by 401
27 more
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 70
- 2026EvoScientist: Towards Multi-Agent Evolving AI Scientists for End-to-End Scientific Discoverycited by 51
- 2023Curriculum Learning for ab initio Deep Learned Refractive Opticscited by 32
- 2026DeltaEvolve: Accelerating Scientific Discovery through Momentum-Driven Evolutioncited by 26
- 2026SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?cited by 12
- 2026AutoResearchBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Complex Scientific Literature Discoverycited by 11
- 2026Harnessing the Collective Intelligence of AI Agents in the Wild for New Discoveriescited by 10
- 2026Agentic AI Scientists Are Not Built For Autonomous Scientific Discoverycited by 8
- 2026EvoMaster: A Foundational Evolving Agent Framework for Agentic Science at Scalecited by 7
- 2026Aster: Autonomous Scientific Discovery over 20x Faster Than Existing Methodscited by 5
- 2026End-to-end autonomous scientific discovery on a real optical platformcited by 5
- 2026MatClaw: An Autonomous Code-First LLM Agent for End-to-End Materials Explorationcited by 4
- 2026CausaLab: A Scalable Environment for Interactive Causal Discovery Toward AI Scientistscited by 4
- 2026Towards Agentic Intelligence for Materials Sciencecited by 3
- 2026AI CFD Scientist: Toward Open-Ended Computational Fluid Dynamics Discovery with Physics-Aware AI Agentscited by 3
- 2026EvoSci: A Bio-Inspired Multi-Agent Framework for the Evolution of Scientific Discoverycited by 3
- 2026AutoMOOSE: An Agentic AI for Autonomous Phase-Field Simulationcited by 2
- 2026Multi-Persona Debate System for Automated Scientific Hypothesis Generationcited by 2
- 2026LAP: An Agent-to-Instrument Protocol for Autonomous Sciencecited by 2
- 2026Autonomous heterogeneous catalyst discovery with a self-evolving multi-agent digital twincited by 2
- 2026Causal Ensemble Agent: Hierarchical Causal Discovery with LLM-guided Expert Reweightingcited by 2
- 2026Epistemic Closure: Autonomous Mechanism Completion for Physically Consistent Simulationcited by 1
- 2026Sci-Mind: Cognitively-Inspired Adversarial Debate for Autonomous Mathematical Modelingcited by 1
- 2026Science Earth: Towards A Planet-Scale Operating System for AI-Native Scientific Discoverycited by 1
- 2026SciTrace: Trajectory-Aware Safety Reasoning for Scientific Discovery Agentscited by 1
- 2026InquiTree: Evaluating AI Agents in the Scientific Inquiry Loop with Paper-Derived Research Treescited by 1
- 2026StatefulDiscovery: Evidence-Calibrated Claim Formation in Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.