mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Weights to Features: SAE-Guided Activation Regularization for LLM Continual Learning

arXiv 2606.26629 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Mechanistic interpretability → SAE features and their applications

Abstract (arXiv)

Weight-space regularization methods such as Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) are the standard approach to catastrophic forgetting in continual learning. However, those methods tend to underperform when applied to large language models. We argue that such underperformance can be partly explained by the ``polysemantic'' nature of large language models: per-weight importance estimates utilized by EWC-style regularization are too coarse and cannot isolate the knowledge that needs protection. In this paper, we propose regularizing instead in the model's activation space, using pretrained Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) as a monosemantic feature dictionary. From the perspective of constrained optimization, we derive a new loss function that uses the SAE feature dictionary to explicitly balance stability and plasticity, and show that EWC is a special case in the one-sided weight-space penalty setting. Unlike replay-based methods that store or revisit examples from earlier tasks, our method requires no previous-task data after mask construction: current-task data is used to compute a compact SAE feature mask, and only this mask is retained for later training. Further, since the feature space has significantly lower dimensionality than the parameter space, the proposed method is more memory efficient. On the TRACE and MedCL continual learning benchmarks, the method achieves the strongest result among approaches without introducing task-specific architectural components, also surpassing traditional weight-space regularization methods like EWC. Beyond performance comparisons, we provide empirical evidence for the polysemanticity thesis: task-relevant representations are linearly separable in the SAE feature basis but indistinguishable from chance in the weight basis, and weight-space protection is nearly non-selective at the concept level.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in SAE features and their applications, one of 13 directions in Mechanistic interpretability. Builds on 17 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2026.

Builds on

17 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2026Scaling Monosemanticity: Extracting Interpretable Features from Claude 3 Sonnet28 May
  2. 2026SAE-FD: Sparse Autoencoder Feature Distillation for Continual Learning of Large Language Models25 May
  3. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Models15 Sep

Other references · 14

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  2. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  3. 2017Gradient Episodic Memory for Continual Learningcited by 1,898
  4. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,361
  5. 2017Memory Aware Synapses: Learning what (not) to forgetcited by 1,105
  6. 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,058
  7. 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 971
  8. 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 911
  9. 2017PackNet: Adding Multiple Tasks to a Single Network by Iterative Pruningcited by 898
  10. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 394
  11. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 312
  12. 2023TRACE: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Continual Learning in Large Language Modelscited by 66
2 more
  1. 2021Natural continual learning: success is a journey, not (just) a destinationcited by 46
  2. 2026MedCL-Bench: Benchmarking stability-efficiency trade-offs and scaling in biomedical continual learningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Persistent Sparse Autoencoders: Learning Feature-Specific Timescales in Language Model Representations
  2. 2026Lost or Hidden? A Concept-Level Forgetting in Supervised Continual Learning
  3. 2024Examining Forgetting in Continual Pre-training of Aligned Large Language Models
  4. 2026Stable and Steerable Sparse Autoencoders with Weight Regularization
  5. 2026Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders
  6. 2024Continual Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
  7. 2023Continual Instruction Tuning for Large Multimodal Models
  8. 2026Lifelong Learning in Vision-Language Models: Enhanced EWC with Cross-Modal Knowledge Retention