Feature Starvation as Geometric Instability in Sparse Autoencoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are used to disentangle the dense, polysemantic internal representations of large language models (LLMs) into interpretable, monosemantic concepts. However, standard ℓ1-regularized SAEs suffer from feature starvation (dead neurons) and shrinkage bias, often requiring computationally expensive heuristic resampling and nondifferentiable hard-masking methods to bypass these challenges. We argue that feature starvation is not merely an empirical artifact of poor data diversity, but a fundamental optimization-geometric pathology of overcomplete dictionaries: the ℓ1-induced sparse coding map is unstable and fundamentally misaligned with shallow, amortized encoders. To address this structural instability, we introduce adaptive elastic net SAEs (AEN-SAEs), a fully differentiable architecture grounded in classical sparse regression. AEN-SAEs combine an ℓ2 structural term that enforces strong convexity and Lipschitz stability with adaptive ℓ1 reweighting that eliminates shrinkage bias and suppresses spurious features, thereby jointly controlling the curvature and interaction structure of the induced polyhedral geometry. Theoretically, we show that AEN-SAEs yield a Lipschitz-continuous sparse coding map and recover the global feature support under mild assumptions. Empirically, across synthetic settings and LLMs (Pythia 70M, Llama 3.1 8B), AEN-SAEs mitigate feature starvation without auxiliary heuristics while maintaining competitive reconstruction abilities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2026.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2020The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modelingcited by 2,346
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 681
- 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 522
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
- 2024Jumping Ahead: Improving Reconstruction Fidelity with JumpReLU Sparse Autoencoderscited by 283
- 2022Tensor Programs V: Tuning Large Neural Networks via Zero-Shot Hyperparameter Transfercited by 272
- 2024Improving Dictionary Learning with Gated Sparse Autoencoderscited by 171
9 more
- 2024A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse Autoencoderscited by 148
- 2025Learning Multi-Level Features with Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 136
- 2025OLMoTrace: Tracing Language Model Outputs Back to Trillions of Training Tokenscited by 27
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning is All You Need for LISTAcited by 22
- 2024Optimal ablation for interpretabilitycited by 21
- 2024Adaptive Sparse Allocation with Mutual Choice & Feature Choice Sparse Autoencoderscited by 9
- 2025Evaluating and Designing Sparse Autoencoders by Approximating Quasi-Orthogonalitycited by 6
- 2024Investigating Neuron Ablation in Attention Heads: The Case for Peak Activation Centeringcited by 4
- 2025Attribution-Guided Distillation of Matryoshka Sparse Autoencoderscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.