Lost or Hidden? A Concept-Level Forgetting in Supervised Continual Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Continual learning studies how models can adapt to new tasks while retaining previously acquired knowledge. Although a broad spectrum of methods has been proposed to mitigate catastrophic forgetting, the field remains predominantly performance-driven, with limited insight into what forgetting actually corresponds to within the vision model's representation space. Prior work has primarily analyzed forgetting through task-level performance or coarse measures of representational drift, without disentangling output-level accessibility from changes in finer-grained internal structure. To this end, we propose a diagnostic framework that leverages Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to define a task-anchored latent feature space, enabling analysis of how task-specific information evolves at a finer granularity, where individual SAE latents are treated as concept proxies for recurring and relatively disentangled visual patterns in the model's internal computations. Within this framework, we decompose forgetting into apparent concept deletion, recoverability, and decodability. We show that a large portion of seemingly lost concept-level information can often be recovered under linearity assumption, with concept decodability degrading as more tasks are introduced. Overall, our findings suggest that a significant part of concept-level forgetting can be attributed to changes in the representational accessibility rather than complete information erasure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 May 2026.
Builds on
25 of 28 references.
References · 25
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,465
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,313
- 2018Experience Replay for Continual Learningcited by 1,074
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2020Dark Experience for General Continual Learning: a Strong, Simple Baselinecited by 895
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 860
- 2020Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classificationcited by 446
- 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
13 more
- 2017Measuring Catastrophic Forgetting in Neural Networkscited by 359
- 2024Transcoders Find Interpretable LLM Feature Circuitscited by 186
- 2022Class-Incremental Continual Learning into the eXtended DER-versecited by 121
- 2022Probing Representation Forgetting in Supervised and Unsupervised Continual Learningcited by 74
- 2025Sparse Autoencoders Learn Monosemantic Features in Vision-Language Modelscited by 70
- 2023Continual Learning: Applications and the Road Forwardcited by 59
- 2024Make Continual Learning Stronger via C-Flatcited by 35
- 2023A Comprehensive Empirical Evaluation on Online Continual Learningcited by 24
- 2025Sparse Autoencoder Features for Classifications and Transferabilitycited by 19
- 2023Preserving Linear Separability in Continual Learning by Backward Feature Projectioncited by 6
- 2025Continual Knowledge Adaptation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2026Putting a Face to Forgetting: Continual Learning meets Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 3
- 2025ConceptGuard: Neuro-Symbolic Safety Guardrails via Sparse Interpretable Jailbreak Conceptscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.