Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaboration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Millions of people use machine translation (MT) tools daily, yet little is known about their perception of what systems can and cannot do. This paper studies users' mental models of speech translation systems through a new framework based on cross-lingual question answering, where users either accept MT output or request professional re-translation to answer questions based on the information presented in a foreign language. By analyzing user behavior and accuracy trends across varying translation qualities, we examine to what extent they can predict where the system is likely to be wrong, and how this mental model evolves. Users develop stronger mental models with practice, especially when they have some knowledge of the source language, primarily by relying on surface-level error cues. Moreover, providing speech transcriptions can help users develop better mental models. Our results show the promise of cross-lingual question answering as a downstream task for studying MT mental models and advancing our understanding of human-AI collaboration.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.
Builds on
25 of 71 references.
References · 25
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
- 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
- 2023xCOMET: Transparent Machine Translation Evaluation through Fine-grained Error Detectioncited by 265
- 2025Organize the Web: Constructing Domains Enhances Pre-Training Data Curationcited by 76
- 2020A Case for Humans-in-the-Loop: Decisions in the Presence of Erroneous Algorithmic Scorescited by 74
- 2019Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AIcited by 63
- 2023MuAViC: A Multilingual Audio-Visual Corpus for Robust Speech Recognition and Robust Speech-to-Text Translationcited by 39
- 2023Physician Detection of Clinical Harm in Machine Translation: Quality Estimation Aids in Reliance and Backtranslation Identifies Critical Errorscited by 22
- 2018Fluency Over Adequacy: A Pilot Study in Measuring User Trust in Imperfect MTcited by 21
- 2020Unmet Needs and Opportunities for Mobile Translation AIcited by 14
- 2022Extrinsic Evaluation of Machine Translation Metricscited by 14
- 2021Is "moby dick" a Whale or a Bird? Named Entities and Terminology in Speech Translationcited by 11
13 more
- 2024XLAVS-R: Cross-Lingual Audio-Visual Speech Representation Learning for Noise-Robust Speech Perceptioncited by 11
- 2021Backtranslation Feedback Improves User Confidence in MT, Not Qualitycited by 10
- 2024SpeechQE: Estimating the Quality of Direct Speech Translationcited by 10
- 2022Calibrating Trust of Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems with Decompositional Probescited by 9
- 2023Explaining with Contrastive Phrasal Highlighting: A Case Study in Assisting Humans to Detect Translation Differencescited by 8
- 2025Translation in the Hands of Many:Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactionscited by 8
- 2024The Illusion of Competence: Evaluating the Effect of Explanations on Users' Mental Models of Visual Question Answering Systemscited by 6
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editingcited by 6
- 2025Sustaining Human Agency, Attending to Its Cost: An Investigation into Generative AI Design for Non-Native Speakers' Language Usecited by 5
- 2025Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2024Beyond Human-Only: Evaluating Human-Machine Collaboration for Collecting High-Quality Translation Datacited by 4
- 2025Speech Translation Refinement using Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Toward Machine Translation Literacy: How Lay Users Perceive and Rely on Imperfect Translationscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.