Backtranslation Feedback Improves User Confidence in MT, Not Quality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Translating text into a language unknown to the text's author, dubbed outbound translation, is a modern need for which the user experience has significant room for improvement, beyond the basic machine translation facility. We demonstrate this by showing three ways in which user confidence in the outbound translation, as well as its overall final quality, can be affected: backward translation, quality estimation (with alignment) and source paraphrasing. In this paper, we describe an experiment on outbound translation from English to Czech and Estonian. We examine the effects of each proposed feedback module and further focus on how the quality of machine translation systems influence these findings and the user perception of success. We show that backward translation feedback has a mixed effect on the whole process: it increases user confidence in the produced translation, but not the objective quality.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2021.
Builds on
8 of 26 references.
References · 8
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
- 2020Unsupervised Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 210
- 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
- 2020Announcing CzEng 2.0 Parallel Corpus with over 2 Gigawordscited by 17
- 2020ELITR Non-Native Speech Translation at IWSLT 2020cited by 5
- 2019Outbound Translation User Interface Ptakopet: A Pilot Studycited by 2
- 2019English-Czech Systems in WMT19: Document-Level Transformercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertaintycited by 23
- 2023RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistencycited by 23
- 2023Physician Detection of Clinical Harm in Machine Translation: Quality Estimation Aids in Reliance and Backtranslation Identifies Critical Errorscited by 22
- 2023Poor Man's Quality Estimation: Predicting Reference-Based MT Metrics Without the Referencecited by 11
- 2025Translation in the Hands of Many:Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactionscited by 8
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editingcited by 6
- 2025An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2025Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2022Beyond General Purpose Machine Translation: The Need for Context-specific Empirical Research to Design for Appropriate User Trustcited by 1
- 2026Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaborationcited by 0
- 2026Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaboration23 Jun 2026
- 2025An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine Translation16 Jun 2025
- 2025Should I Share this Translation? Evaluating Quality Feedback for User Reliance on Machine Translation30 May 2025
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editing4 Mar 2025
- 2025Translation in the Hands of Many:Centering Lay Users in Machine Translation Interactions19 Feb 2025
- 2023RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistency28 Nov 2023
- 2023Physician Detection of Clinical Harm in Machine Translation: Quality Estimation Aids in Reliance and Backtranslation Identifies Critical Errors25 Oct 2023
- 2023A Diachronic Perspective on User Trust in AI under Uncertainty20 Oct 2023
- 2023Poor Man's Quality Estimation: Predicting Reference-Based MT Metrics Without the Reference21 Jan 2023
- 2022Beyond General Purpose Machine Translation: The Need for Context-specific Empirical Research to Design for Appropriate User Trust13 May 2022