mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Calibrating Trust of Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems with Decompositional Probes

arXiv 2204.07693 ↗First posted 16 Apr 2022cs.CLcited by 9

On the map: LLM reasoning → Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-hop Question Answering (QA) is a challenging task since it requires an accurate aggregation of information from multiple context paragraphs and a thorough understanding of the underlying reasoning chains. Recent work in multi-hop QA has shown that performance can be boosted by first decomposing the questions into simpler, single-hop questions. In this paper, we explore one additional utility of the multi-hop decomposition from the perspective of explainable NLP: to create explanation by probing a neural QA model with them. We hypothesize that in doing so, users will be better able to predict when the underlying QA system will give the correct answer. Through human participant studies, we verify that exposing the decomposition probes and answers to the probes to users can increase their ability to predict system performance on a question instance basis. We show that decomposition is an effective form of probing QA systems as well as a promising approach to explanation generation. In-depth analyses show the need for improvements in decomposition systems.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2022.

Builds on

26 of 45 references.

References · 26

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  9. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  10. 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
  11. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 629
  12. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
14 more
  1. 2021Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processingcited by 526
  2. 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
  3. 2020Evaluating Explainable AI: Which Algorithmic Explanations Help Users Predict Model Behavior?cited by 189
  4. 2019Multi-hop Reading Comprehension through Question Decomposition and Rescoringcited by 119
  5. 2020Unsupervised Question Decomposition for Question Answeringcited by 118
  6. 2021Few-Shot Self-Rationalization with Natural Language Promptscited by 83
  7. 2020Text Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Tasks in the Language of Existing Modelscited by 65
  8. 2019Select, Answer and Explain: Interpretable Multi-hop Reading Comprehension over Multiple Documentscited by 57
  9. 2018Do Explanations make VQA Models more Predictable to a Human?cited by 51
  10. 2020Do Multi-Hop Question Answering Systems Know How to Answer the Single-Hop Sub-Questions?cited by 29
  11. 2019Question Answering is a Format; When is it Useful?cited by 25
  12. 2022Diagnosing AI Explanation Methods with Folk Concepts of Behaviorcited by 15
  13. 2017It Takes Two to Tango: Towards Theory of AI's Mindcited by 11
  14. 2021Trust Calibration and Trust Respect: A Method for Building Team Cohesion in Human Robot Teamscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

9 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2022Ask to Understand: Question Generation for Multi-hop Question Answering
  2. 2022Interpretable AMR-Based Question Decomposition for Multi-hop Question Answering
  3. 2023HOP, UNION, GENERATE: Explainable Multi-hop Reasoning without Rationale Supervision
  4. 2026Retrieval--Reasoning Processes for Multi-hop Question Answering: A Four-Axis Design Framework and Empirical Trends
  5. 2023Leveraging Structured Information for Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering and Reasoning
  6. 2022Understanding and Improving Zero-shot Multi-hop Reasoning in Generative Question Answering
  7. 2022Locate Then Ask: Interpretable Stepwise Reasoning for Multi-hop Question Answering
  8. 2025BELLE: A Bi-Level Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Multi-Hop Question Answering