Beyond Human-Only: Evaluating Human-Machine Collaboration for Collecting High-Quality Translation Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collecting high-quality translations is crucial for the development and evaluation of machine translation systems. However, traditional human-only approaches are costly and slow. This study presents a comprehensive investigation of 11 approaches for acquiring translation data, including human-only, machineonly, and hybrid approaches. Our findings demonstrate that human-machine collaboration can match or even exceed the quality of human-only translations, while being more cost-efficient. Error analysis reveals the complementary strengths between human and machine contributions, highlighting the effectiveness of collaborative methods. Cost analysis further demonstrates the economic benefits of human-machine collaboration methods, with some approaches achieving top-tier quality at around 60% of the cost of traditional methods. We release a publicly available dataset containing nearly 18,000 segments of varying translation quality with corresponding human ratings to facilitate future research.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2024.
Builds on
8 of 30 references.
References · 8
- 2021Experts, Errors, and Context: A Large-Scale Study of Human Evaluation for Machine Translationcited by 333
- 2021High Quality Rather than High Model Probability: Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding with Neural Metricscited by 104
- 2023The Devil is in the Errors: Leveraging Large Language Models for Fine-grained Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 95
- 2023LLMRefine: Pinpointing and Refining Large Language Models via Fine-Grained Actionable Feedbackcited by 39
- 2019Post-editese: an Exacerbated Translationesecited by 29
- 2024GPT-4 vs. Human Translators: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Translation Quality Across Languages, Domains, and Expertise Levelscited by 20
- 2021Neural Machine Translation Quality and Post-Editing Performancecited by 12
- 2024Quality and Quantity of Machine Translation References for Automatic Metricscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Mitigating Metric Bias in Minimum Bayes Risk Decodingcited by 15
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editingcited by 6
- 2025MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translationcited by 2
- 2026Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaborationcited by 0
- 2026Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaboration23 Jun 2026
- 2025MQM Re-Annotation: A Technique for Collaborative Evaluation of Machine Translation28 Oct 2025
- 2025QE4PE: Word-level Quality Estimation for Human Post-Editing4 Mar 2025
- 2024Mitigating Metric Bias in Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding5 Nov 2024