mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economy

arXiv 2606.24177 ↗First posted 23 Jun 2026cs.SE cs.AI cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models are making research production scalable, shifting the bottleneck from producing artifacts to judging claims. We present textscAgon, a research orchestrator that validates what can be checked inside the workflow and leaves the remaining judgments to human scientists. textscAgon is built on six design principles: Prompt Economy, Future-Facing, Minimal Prompts, OmniDisciplinary, Massive Parallelism, and Zero-Code. We ran textscAgon across domains for 444 iterations of Prompt Economy loops, using only small starting topics and no human-written experimental code. These deployments demonstrate scalability while exposing new classes of failure. We organize these failures into a taxonomy along severity, fixability, visibility, and capability locus. The taxonomy separates failures the loops can see and fix from those that require human judgment. Together, these results show that textscAgon is pushing research toward a new paradigm: machine scales, human steers.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2026.

Builds on

20 of 26 references.

References · 20

  1. 2024The AI Scientist: Towards Fully Automated Open-Ended Scientific Discoverycited by 1,071
  2. 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 425
  3. 2025The AI Scientist-v2: Workshop-Level Automated Scientific Discovery via Agentic Tree Searchcited by 422
  4. 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
  5. 2024CycleResearcher: Improving Automated Research via Automated Reviewcited by 148
  6. 2025MLR-Bench: Evaluating AI Agents on Open-Ended Machine Learning Researchcited by 64
  7. 2025Can LLM feedback enhance review quality? A randomized study of 20K reviews at ICLR 2025cited by 47
  8. 2025InternAgent: When Agent Becomes the Scientist -- Building Closed-Loop System from Hypothesis to Verificationcited by 46
  9. 2025When AI Co-Scientists Fail: SPOT-a Benchmark for Automated Verification of Scientific Researchcited by 26
  10. 2026ScientistOne: Towards Human-Level Autonomous Research via Chain-of-Evidencecited by 19
  11. 2026AgentV-RL: Scaling Reward Modeling with Agentic Verifiercited by 15
  12. 2026SoundnessBench: Can Your AI Scientist Really Tell Good Research Ideas from Bad Ones?cited by 12
8 more
  1. 2025BadScientist: Can a Research Agent Write Convincing but Unsound Papers that Fool LLM Reviewers?cited by 8
  2. 2026From Fluent to Verifiable: Claim-Level Auditability for Deep Research Agentscited by 7
  3. 2025Tree-of-Debate: Multi-Persona Debate Trees Elicit Critical Thinking for Scientific Comparative Analysiscited by 6
  4. 2025Evidence-Bound Autonomous Research (EviBound): A Governance Framework for Eliminating False Claimscited by 6
  5. 2026DeployBench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Research Artifact Deploymentcited by 6
  6. 2026PerspectiveGap: A Benchmark for Multi-Agent Orchestration Promptingcited by 6
  7. 2026Sibyl-AutoResearch: Autonomous Research Needs Self-Evolving Trial-and-Error Harnesses, Not Paper Generatorscited by 3
  8. 2026NORA: A Harness-Engineered Autonomous Research Agent for End-to-End Spatial Data Sciencecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.