Sibyl-AutoResearch: Autonomous Research Needs Self-Evolving Trial-and-Error Harnesses, Not Paper Generators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Autonomous research systems increasingly make the scientific workflow executable: agents can propose ideas, run code, inspect results, and draft papers. But executable workflows do not by themselves produce research judgment. We analyze where current systems lose trial experience: weak evidence becomes prose, pilot signals become broad claims, memory remains textual, and recurring process failures do not change later behavior. We introduce Sibyl-AutoResearch, a self-evolving AutoResearch framework built around Scientific Trial-and-Error Harnesses. A harness lets agents run bounded trials, preserve positive and negative outcomes, and route lessons into later planning, validation, claim scope, scheduling, critique, writing, and harness repair. We formalize this through two auditable conversion units: trial-to-behavior conversion, which links trial signals to later research actions, and trial-to-harness-behavior conversion, which links recurring process failures to system updates. We implement the framework in SIBYL, a file-backed autonomous research system that exposes the state, roles, memory, gates, and artifact traces needed to inspect these conversion paths. A retrospective audit identifies eight high-confidence conversion events, with a median latency of one iteration and a maximum latency of three iterations. A recovered-failure registry further shows how five naturally occurring failure classes, including duplicate results, stale numbers, and unsupported statistics, were blocked, downgraded, or routed into later repair. These traces do not establish a comparative performance claim; they show that the proposed conversion units are recoverable from realistic autonomous-research workspaces. The SIBYL framework and system are available at https://github.com/Sibyl-Research-Team/AutoResearch-SibylSystem.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 May 2026.
Builds on
11 of 33 references.
References · 11
- 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
- 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2016Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,499
- 2025Agent Laboratory: Using LLM Agents as Research Assistantscited by 425
- 2025PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI Researchcited by 321
- 2025Robin: A multi-agent system for automating scientific discoverycited by 62
- 2026Aster: Autonomous Scientific Discovery over 20x Faster Than Existing Methodscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economycited by 4
- 2026ResearchLoop: An Evidence-Gated Control Plane for AI-Assisted Researchcited by 3
- 2026One Reflection Is Not Enough: Self-Correcting Autonomous Research via Multi-Hypothesis Failure Attributioncited by 1
- 2026One Reflection Is Not Enough: Self-Correcting Autonomous Research via Multi-Hypothesis Failure Attribution30 Jun 2026
- 2026Agon: An Autonomous Large-Scale Omnidisciplinary Research System Built on Prompt Economy23 Jun 2026
- 2026ResearchLoop: An Evidence-Gated Control Plane for AI-Assisted Research27 May 2026