AI Fiction in the Wild
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Some professional authors are beginning to use AI tools to help produce their fiction writing. Are readers using AI to generate fiction, too? Drawing on over 500,000 anonymized, English-language ChatGPT-user conversations (arXiv:2405.01470), we find that more than one third of the conversations involve some form of fiction generation -- including original stories, roleplay, fanfiction, and erotica. This AI-generated fiction is notably dominated by power users. We identify common fiction generation patterns and profiles among these users, including what we call "infinite story demanders," who repeatedly request and revise variations of the same or similar narratives over extended periods of time. We show that users especially gravitate toward fanfiction and erotica, and that they are broadly drawn to generic forms, repetition, immediacy, and niche combinations of story elements. Our findings motivate two theoretical provocations. First, we argue that AI technologies may lead to a shift in the conventional relationship between the author and reader, potentially producing what we call a "solipsistic reader-writer," who both generates and consumes fiction within a closed conversational loop, interacting with a machine rather than a human other. Second, we note that LLMs enable interactivity, play, and permutation in ways that are seemingly pleasurable for users, raising questions about where AI will fit into contemporary storytelling and entertainment ecosystems. We situate these developments within broader transformations in literature and media, including self-publishing, fanfiction, and pornography, and suggest that AI-generated fiction shares structural affinities with on-demand, personalized, and repetitive cultural forms.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 83 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2026.
Builds on
26 of 83 references.
References · 26
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
- 2023LMSYS-Chat-1M: A Large-Scale Real-World LLM Conversation Datasetcited by 461
- 2023Role-Play with Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2023Speak, Memory: An Archaeology of Books Known to ChatGPT/GPT-4cited by 125
- 2023LongEval: Guidelines for Human Evaluation of Faithfulness in Long-form Summarizationcited by 96
- 2025Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversationscited by 96
- 2024Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Usecited by 72
- 2023Machine Culturecited by 55
- 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 47
- 2023The Shifted and The Overlooked: A Task-oriented Investigation of User-GPT Interactionscited by 45
- 2023Using Large Language Models to Generate, Validate, and Apply User Intent Taxonomiescited by 34
14 more
- 2025Extracting memorized pieces of (copyrighted) books from open-weight language modelscited by 30
- 2024Pron vs Prompt: Can Large Language Models already Challenge a World-Class Fiction Author at Creative Text Writing?cited by 27
- 2025Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupationscited by 19
- 2024The Use of Generative Search Engines for Knowledge Work and Complex Taskscited by 18
- 2024Small Language Models can Outperform Humans in Short Creative Writing: A Study Comparing SLMs with Humans and LLMscited by 17
- 2024Does ChatGPT Have a Poetic Style?cited by 12
- 2024On Classification with Large Language Models in Cultural Analyticscited by 9
- 2026Can Good Writing Be Generative? Expert-Level AI Writing Emerges through Fine-Tuning on High-Quality Bookscited by 9
- 2025Readers Prefer Outputs of AI Trained on Copyrighted Books over Expert Human Writerscited by 8
- 2025Why Slop Matterscited by 6
- 2016More Than Peer Production: Fanfiction Communities as Sites of Distributed Mentoringcited by 2
- 2026AI as Entertainmentcited by 2
- 2026The AI Fiction Paradoxcited by 2
- 2026Adopt neq Adapt: Longitudinal Analyses of LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.