mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations

arXiv 2507.07935 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2025cs.AI cs.CY econ.GNcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With generative AI emerging as a general-purpose technology, understanding its economic effects is among society's most pressing questions. Existing studies of AI impact have largely relied on predictions of AI capabilities or focused narrowly on individual firms. Drawing instead on real-world AI usage, we analyze a dataset of 200k anonymized conversations with Microsoft Bing Copilot to measure AI applicability to occupations. We use an LLM-based pipeline to classify the O*NET work activities assisted or performed by AI in each conversation. We find that the most common and successful AI-assisted work activities involve information work--the creation, processing, and communication of information. At the occupation level, we find widespread AI applicability cutting across sectors, as most occupations have information work components. Our methodology also allows us to predict which occupations are more likely to delegate tasks to AI and which are more likely to use AI to assist existing workflows.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2025.

Builds on

6 of 52 references.

References · 6

  1. 2023The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilotcited by 274
  2. 2023Towards Accurate Differential Diagnosis with Large Language Modelscited by 116
  3. 2025Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversationscited by 96
  4. 2025Future of Work with AI Agents: Auditing Automation and Augmentation Potential across the U.S. Workforcecited by 38
  5. 2024The Use of Generative Search Engines for Knowledge Work and Complex Taskscited by 18
  6. 2023The Potential Impact of AI Innovations on U.S. Occupationscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 17.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2026LLMs Corrupt Your Documents When You Delegatecited by 9
  2. 2025DuetUI: A Bidirectional Context Loop for Human-Agent Co-Generation of Task-Oriented Interfacescited by 4
  3. 2025Generative AI Practices, Literacy, and Divides: An Empirical Analysis in the Italian Contextcited by 2
  4. 2026"If You're Very Clever, No One Knows You've Used It": The Social Dynamics of Developing Generative AI Literacy in the Workplacecited by 2
  5. 2026Deep FinResearch Bench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Conduct Professional Financial Investment Researchcited by 2
  6. 2026Reflections and New Directions for Human-Centered Large Language Modelscited by 2
  7. 2026AI Fiction in the Wildcited by 2
  8. 2026Google's AI & Economy ATLAS v1.0: Mapping Gemini Usage in the Economycited by 2
  9. 2026Crashing Waves vs. Rising Tides: Findings on AI Automation from Thousands of Worker Evaluations of Labor Market Taskscited by 1
  10. 2026How AI Writing Assistance Distorts Perceptions of AI Users and Their Opinionscited by 1
  11. 2026Adopt neq Adapt: Longitudinal Analyses of LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 1
  12. 2026AI Technologies in Language Access: Attitudes Towards AI and the Human Value of Language Access Managerscited by 0
7 more
  1. 2026Generative AI and the Reorganization of Labor Demandcited by 0
  2. 2026Measuring the Occupation-Level Impact of AbbVie Intelligence: AI Applicability Analysis, 2024-2025cited by 0
  3. 2026The Jagged Global Economy: Frontier AI Unevenly Exposes National Economiescited by 0
  4. 2026How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPTcited by 0
  5. 2026Who Delegates to AI? Evidence from Agent Configurations in Githubcited by 0
  6. 2026Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firmcited by 0
  7. 2026Dissecting the Carbon-SLO Tension in Geo-Distributed LLM Servingcited by 0