mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantile Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Confidence Calibration

arXiv 2606.21749 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks often produce poorly calibrated confidence estimates, overstating their certainty even when predictions are incorrect. Temperature Scaling remains the most widely used posthoc calibration method due to its simplicity and effectiveness, yet its global, uniform rescaling of logits fails to correct the highly heterogeneous structure of miscalibration observed across the confidence spectrum. In particular, the largest correctness confidence discrepancies arise in different quantile regions depending on the setting, low confidence predictions, where uncertainty matters most, tend to exhibit the largest correctness confidence discrepancies, which standard TS leaves largely unaddressed. We introduce Quantile Adaptive Temperature Scaling (QaTS), a simple and efficient post hoc calibration method that adapts the temperature as a function of a predictions empirical confidence quantile. By mapping confidences into the quantile space, QaTS normalizes the calibration problem, makes the structure of miscalibration explicit and enables a monotone temperature function that adapts across quantiles while leaving well calibrated high confidence predictions largely unchanged. preserving high confidence behavior. This quantile aware formulation aligns naturally with a reparameterized Expected Calibration Error (ECE) objective and yields a sample wise temperature that is robust across a variety of challenging scenarios, such as class imbalance and distributional shifts. Across a broad range of datasets, architectures, evaluation scenarios and diverse tasks, QaTS consistently, and substantially, outperforms state of the art post hoc calibration methods, delivering more reliable and trustworthy confidence estimates without modifying model predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

36 of 50 references.

References · 36

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  4. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  5. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  6. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  7. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  8. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  9. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  10. 2019Large-Scale Long-Tailed Recognition in an Open Worldcited by 704
  11. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 461
  12. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
24 more
  1. 2020Calibrating Deep Neural Networks using Focal Losscited by 353
  2. 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
  3. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
  4. 2020MedMNIST Classification Decathlon: A Lightweight AutoML Benchmark for Medical Image Analysiscited by 206
  5. 2020Mix-n-Match: Ensemble and Compositional Methods for Uncertainty Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 190
  6. 2020Calibration of Neural Networks using Splinescited by 97
  7. 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
  8. 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
  9. 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
  10. 2021When and How Mixup Improves Calibrationcited by 59
  11. 2021Parameterized Temperature Scaling for Boosting the Expressive Power in Post-Hoc Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 48
  12. 2022Sample-dependent Adaptive Temperature Scaling for Improved Calibrationcited by 48
  13. 2022Robust Calibration with Multi-domain Temperature Scalingcited by 39
  14. 2024Robust Calibration of Large Vision-Language Adapterscited by 28
  15. 2021Confidence Calibration for Domain Generalization under Covariate Shiftcited by 27
  16. 2023Proximity-Informed Calibration for Deep Neural Networkscited by 18
  17. 2023ACLS: Adaptive and Conditional Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 15
  18. 2021Maximum Entropy on Erroneous Predictions (MEEP): Improving model calibration for medical image segmentationcited by 13
  19. 2022Class Adaptive Network Calibrationcited by 13
  20. 2023Trust your neighbours: Penalty-based constraints for model calibrationcited by 12
  21. 2023Beyond Probability Partitions: Calibrating Neural Networks with Semantic Aware Groupingcited by 10
  22. 2024Feature Clipping for Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 8
  23. 2023Scaling of Class-wise Training Losses for Post-hoc Calibrationcited by 7
  24. 2024Uncertainty Calibration with Energy Based Instance-wise Scaling in the Wild Datasetcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.